...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions >Differences in liquid cloud droplet effective radius and number concentration estimates between MODIS collections 5.1 and 6 over global oceans
【24h】

Differences in liquid cloud droplet effective radius and number concentration estimates between MODIS collections 5.1 and 6 over global oceans

机译:液体云液滴的差异有效半径和Modis Collections 5.1和6在全球海洋之间的数量估计

获取原文
           

摘要

Differences in cloud droplet effective radius and cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) estimates inferred from the Aqua–MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) collections 5.1 (C5.1) and 6 (C6) cloud products (MYD06) are examined for warm clouds over global oceans for the year 2008. Individual pixel level retrievals for both collections are aggregated to 1°??×??1° and compared globally and regionally for the three main spectral channel pairs used for MODIS cloud optical property retrievals. Comparisons between both collections are performed for cases in which all three effective radii retrievals are classified by the MODIS cloud product as valid. The contribution to the observed differences of several key MYD06 Collection 6 algorithm updates are also explored, with a focus on changes to the surface reflectance model, assumed solar irradiance, above-cloud emission, cloud-top pressure (CTP), and pixel registration. Global results show a neutral to positive (?50?cm?3) change for C6-derived CDNC relative to C5.1 for the 1.6 and 2.1?μm channel retrievals, corresponding to a neutral to ?2?μm difference in droplet effective radius (re). For 3.7?μm retrievals, CDNC results show a negative change in the tropics, with differences transitioning toward positive values with increasing latitude spanning ?25 to +50?cm?3 related to a +2.5 to ?1?μm transition in effective radius. Cloud optical thickness (τ) differences were small relative to effective radius and found to not significantly impact CDNC estimates. Regionally, the magnitude and behavior of the annual CDNC cycle are compared for each effective radius retrieval. Results from this study indicate significant inter-collection differences in aggregated values of effective radius due to changes to the precomputed retrieval lookup tables (LUTs) for ocean scenes, changes to retrieved cloud-top pressure, solar irradiance, or above-cloud thermal emission, depending upon spectral channel. The observed differences between collections may have implications for existing MODIS-derived climatologies and validation studies of effective radius and CDNC.
机译:从Aqua-Modis(中等分辨率成像分光镜)收集5.1(C5.1)和6(C6)云产品(MYD06)中推断出云液滴有效半径和云液滴数浓度(CDNC)估计的差异2008年的全球海洋。两个集合的个体像素水平检索被聚集到1°??×?? 1°,并在全球和区域上进行比较,用于用于MODIS云光学特性检索的三个主要光谱通道对。对两个集合之间的比较都是针对所有三个有效的半径检索的情况执行的,由MODIS云产品为有效的。还探讨了对观察到的几个关键MYD06集合6算法更新的贡献,重点是对表面反射模型的变化,假设太阳辐照度,高于云发射,云顶部压力(CTP)和像素配准。全局结果显示了相对于1.6和2.1?μm通道检索的C6衍生CDNC的中性(Δ50Ωcm≤3),相对于C5.1的C5.1,对应于液滴有效半径的中性和液滴中的Δ2Ω·μm差异(关于)。对于3.7?μm检索,CDNC结果显示了热带地带的负变化,差异过渡到跨度跨越跨度Δ25至+50Ω·厘米Δ3与+2.5到Δ1Ω·μm过渡有效半径的转变。云光学厚度(τ)差异相对于有效半径小,并且发现不显着影响CDNC估计。区域地,对每个有效的半径检索进行比较年度CDNC周期的幅度和行为。本研究结果表明,由于海洋场景的预先计算检索查找表(LUTS)的变化,对有效半径的聚合值的集合值的显着收集差异,改变了云顶压力,太阳能辐照度或高度云热发射,取决于光谱通道。所观察到的收集差异可能对现有的Modis衍生的气候学和有效半径和CDNC的验证研究有影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号