首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Evaluation of near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data
【24h】

Evaluation of near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data

机译:在全球建模倡议中结合对流层/对流层模型和臭氧探空仪数据评估对流层顶臭氧分布

获取原文
           

摘要

The NASA Global Modeling Initiative has developed a combinedstratosphere/troposphere chemistry and transport model which fullyrepresents the processes governing atmospheric composition near thetropopause. We evaluate model ozone distributions near the tropopause, usingtwo high vertical resolution monthly mean ozone profile climatologiesconstructed with ozonesonde data, one by averaging on pressure levels andthe other relative to the thermal tropopause. At the tropopause, model ozone is high-biased inthe SH tropics and NH midlatitudes by ~45% in a 4°latitude ×5° longitude model simulation. Doubling the resolution to2°×2.5° increases the NH high bias to ~60%,and reduces the tropical bias to ~30%, apparently due todecreased horizontal transport between the tropics and extratropics in thehigher-resolution simulation. These ozone biases do not appearto be due to an overly vigorous residual circulation, insufficient convection, or excessivestratosphere/troposphere exchange, and so may be due to insufficientvertical resolution or excessive vertical diffusion near the tropopause. Inthe upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, model/measurementintercomparisons are strongly affected by the averaging technique.Compared to the pressure-averaged climatology, NH andtropical mean model lower stratospheric biases are >20%. In the uppertroposphere, the 2°×2.5° simulation shows mean high biases of~20% and ~35% during April in the tropics and NHmidlatitudes, respectively. This apparently good model/measurement agreement degrades whenrelative-to-tropopause averages are considered, with upper troposphere highbiases of ~30% and 70% in the tropics and NH midlatitudes. This occursbecause relative-to-tropopause averaging better preserves the largercross-tropopause O3 gradients which are seen in the daily sonde data,but not in daily model profiles. Relative-to-tropopause averages thereforemore accurately reveal model/measurement discrepancies.The relative annual cycle of ozone near thetropopause is reproduced very well in the model Northern Hemispheremidlatitudes. In the tropics, the model amplitude of the near-tropopauseannual cycle is weak. This is likely due to the annual amplitude of meanvertical upwelling near the tropopause, which analysis suggests is ~30% weaker than in the real atmosphere.
机译:美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的全球建模倡议开发了一种平流层/对流层化学和运输相结合的模型,该模型完全代表了控制对流层顶附近大气成分的过程。我们使用由探空仪数据构成的两个高垂直分辨率月平均臭氧廓线气候来评估对流层顶附近的臭氧分布模型,一个平均压力水平,另一个相对于热对流层顶。在对流层顶,在4°纬度×5°经度模型模拟中,SH热带和NH中纬度的臭氧模型偏高约45%。将分辨率加倍至2°×2.5°会使NH高偏差增加到〜60%,并将热带偏差减小到〜30%,这显然是由于高分辨率模拟中热带和温带之间水平传输的减少。这些臭氧偏差似乎不是由于残留循环过度剧烈,对流不足或平流层/对流层交换过多而引起的,因此可能是由于对流层顶附近的垂直分辨率不足或垂直扩散过度所致。在平流层上层和平流层下层,模型/测量的比对结果受到平均技术的强烈影响。 与压力平均气候相比,NH和热带平均模型的平流层下层偏差> 20%。在对流层上空,2°×2.5°的模拟显示,热带地区和北半球高纬度地区在4月期间的平均高偏差分别为〜20%和〜35%。当考虑相对于对流层顶的平均值时,这种看似好的模型/测量协议会退化,在热带和北半球中纬度地区,对流层的高偏高约为30%和70%。这是因为相对于对流层顶平均更好地保留了较大的跨对流层顶O 3 梯度,这些梯度在日主机数据中可见,但在日模型轮廓中却没有。因此,相对于对流层顶的平均数可以更准确地揭示出模型/测量的差异。北半球中纬度模型很好地再现了对流层顶附近臭氧的相对年循环。在热带地区,对流层顶年周期的模型振幅很弱。这很可能是由于对流层顶附近的平均垂直上升流的年振幅所致,分析表明,该振幅比真实大气层弱约30%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号