首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Assessment of the total precipitable water from a sun photometer, microwave radiometer and radiosondes at a continental site in southeastern Europe
【24h】

Assessment of the total precipitable water from a sun photometer, microwave radiometer and radiosondes at a continental site in southeastern Europe

机译:评估东南欧大陆某地的太阳光度计,微波辐射计和探空仪产生的可沉淀水总量

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this study, we discuss the differences in the total precipitable water (TPW), retrieved from a Cimel sun photometer operating at a continental site in southeast Europe, between version 3 (V3) and version 2 (V2) of the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) algorithms. In addition, we evaluate the performance of the two algorithms comparing their product with the TPW obtained from a collocated microwave radiometer and nearby radiosondes during the period 2007–2017. The TPW from all three instruments was highly correlated, showing the same annual cycle, with lower values during winter and higher values during summer. The sun photometer and the microwave radiometer depict the same daily cycle, with some discrepancies during early morning and late afternoon due to the effect of solar zenith angle on the measurements of the photometer. The TPW from V3 of the AERONET algorithm has small differences compared with V2, mostly related to the use of the new laboratory-based temperature coefficients used in V3. The microwave radiometer measurements are in good agreement with those obtained by the radiosonde, especially during night-time when the differences between the two instruments are almost negligible. The comparison of the sun photometer data with high-quality independent measurements from radiosondes and the radiometer shows that the absolute differences between V3 and the other two datasets are slightly higher compared with V2. However, V3 has a lower dependence from the TPW and the internal sensor temperature, indicating a better performance of the retrieving algorithm. The calculated one-sigma uncertainty for V3 as estimated, from the comparison with the radiosondes, is about 10?%, which is in accordance with previous studies for the estimation of uncertainty for V2. This uncertainty is further reduced to about 6?% when AERONET V3 is compared with the collocated microwave radiometer. To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth analysis of the V3 TPW, and although the findings presented here are for a specific site, we believe that they are representative of other mid-latitude continental stations.
机译:在这项研究中,我们讨论了从AErosol机器人网络的第3版(V3)和第2版(V2)在东南部欧洲大陆站点运行的Cimel太阳光度计获得的总可沉淀水(TPW)之间的差异( AERONET)算法。此外,我们评估了这两种算法的性能,并将它们的产品与2007-2017年期间从并置的微波辐射计和附近的探空仪获得的TPW进行了比较。所有这三个工具的TPW高度相关,显示相同的年周期,冬季较低,夏季较高。太阳光度计和微波辐射计描绘了相同的每日周期,由于太阳天顶角对光度计的测量结果的影响,在清晨和下午晚些时候会有一些差异。与V2相比,AERONET算法的V3中的TPW差异很小,主要与V3中使用的新的基于实验室的温度系数有关。微波辐射计的测量结果与探空仪的测量结果非常吻合,尤其是在夜间,这两种仪器之间的差异几乎可以忽略不计。太阳光度计数据与来自探空仪和辐射计的高质量独立测量值的比较表明,V3和其他两个数据集之间的绝对差值比V2稍高。但是,V3对TPW和内部传感器温度的依赖性较低,表明检索算法的性能更好。通过与无线电探空仪的比较,估计得出的V3的一西格玛不确定度约为10%,这与先前有关V2不确定度估计的研究一致。当将AERONET V3与并置的微波辐射计进行比较时,这种不确定性进一步降低到了约6%。据我们所知,这是对V3 TPW的首次深入分析,尽管此处介绍的发现是针对特定站点的,但我们认为它们代表了其他中纬度大陆站。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号