首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Effectiveness evaluation of temporary emission control action in 2016 in winter in Shijiazhuang, China
【24h】

Effectiveness evaluation of temporary emission control action in 2016 in winter in Shijiazhuang, China

机译:石家庄市2016年冬季临时排污行动效果评价

获取原文
       

摘要

To evaluate the environmental effectiveness of the control measures for atmospheric pollution in Shijiazhuang, China, a large-scale controlling experiment for emission sources of atmospheric pollutants (i.e. a temporary emission control action, TECA) was designed and implemented during 1 November 2016 to 9 January 2017. Compared to the no-control action and heating period (NCAHP), under unfavourable meteorological conditions, the mean concentrations of PMsub2.5/sub, PMsub10/sub, SOsub2/sub, NOsub2/sub, and chemical species (Si, Al, Casup2+/sup, Mgsup2+/sup) in PMsub2.5/sub during the control action and heating period (CAHP) still decreased by 8, 8, 5, 19, 30.3, 4.5, 47.0, and 45.2?%, respectively, indicating that the control measures for atmospheric pollution were effective. The effects of control measures in suburbs were better than those in urban area, especially for the control effects of particulate matter sources. The control effects for emission sources of carbon monoxide?(CO) were not apparent during the TECA period, especially in suburbs, likely due to the increasing usage of domestic coal in suburbs along with the temperature decreasing.The results of positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis showed that crustal dust, secondary sources, vehicle emissions, coal combustion and industrial emissions were main PMsub2.5/sub sources. Compared to the whole year?(WY) and the no-control action and no-heating period?(NCANHP), the contribution concentrations and proportions of coal combustion to PMsub2.5/sub increased significantly during other stages of the TECA period. The contribution concentrations and proportions of crustal dust and vehicle emissions to PMsub2.5/sub decreased noticeably during the CAHP compared to other stages of the TECA period. The contribution concentrations and proportions of industrial emissions to PMsub2.5/sub during the CAHP decreased noticeably compared to the NCAHP. The pollutants' emission sources during the CAHP were in effective control, especially for crustal dust and vehicles. However, the necessary coal heating for the cold winter and the unfavourable meteorological conditions had an offset effect on the control measures for emission sources to some degree. The results also illustrated that the discharge of pollutants might still be enormous even under such strict control measures.The backward trajectory and potential source contribution function?(PSCF) analysis in the light of atmospheric pollutants suggested that the potential source areas mainly involved the surrounding regions of Shijiazhuang, i.e. south of Hebei and north of Henan and Shanxi. The regional nature of the atmospheric pollution in the North China Plain revealed that there is an urgent need for making cross-boundary control policies in addition to local control measures given the high background level of pollutants.The TECA is an important practical exercise but it cannot be advocated for as the normalized control measures for atmospheric pollution in China. The direct cause of atmospheric pollution in China is the emission of pollutants exceeding the air environment's self-purification capacity, which is caused by an unreasonable and unhealthy pattern for economic development in China.
机译:为了评估中国石家庄大气污染控制措施的环境有效性,于2016年11月1日至1月9日设计并实施了大气污染物排放源的大规模控制试验(即临时排放控制措施,TECA)。 2017.与无控制措施和加热时间(NCAHP)相比,在不利的气象条件下,PM 2.5 ,PM 10 ,SO 2的平均浓度,NO 2 和PM 中的化学物质(Si,Al,Ca 2 + ,Mg 2 + ) 2.5的控制作用和加热期(CAHP)仍分别下降了8、8、5、19、30.3、4.5、47.0和45.2%,表明大气污染控制措施是有效的。郊区的控制措施效果要好于城市,特别是颗粒物源的控制效果。在TECA时期,特别是在郊区,对一氧化碳(CO)排放源的控制效果并不明显,这可能是由于郊区家用煤的使用量增加以及温度降低所致。 )分析表明,地壳粉尘,次要来源,车辆排放,煤炭燃烧和工业排放是PM 2.5 的主要来源。与全年(WY),无控制行动和无加热期(NCANHP)相比,燃煤对PM 2.5 的贡献浓度和比例在其他阶段显着增加。 TECA期。与TECA时期的其他阶段相比,CAHP期间地壳粉尘和车辆排放物对PM 2.5 的贡献浓度和比例显着下降。与NCAHP相比,CAHP期间工业污染物对PM 2.5 的贡献浓度和比例显着下降。在CAHP期间,污染物的排放源得到了有效控制,特别是对于地壳粉尘和车辆。但是,寒冷的冬季需要采煤,不利的气象条件在一定程度上抵消了排放源的控制措施。研究结果还表明,即使采取如此严格的控制措施,污染物的排放量仍可能很大。根据大气污染物的向后轨迹和潜在源贡献函数?(PSCF)分析表明,潜在源区主要涉及周边地区石家庄市,即河北南部,河南和山西北部。华北平原大气污染的区域性表明,鉴于污染物的高背景水平,除地方控制措施外,迫切需要制定跨边界控制政策.TECA是一项重要的实践活动,但不能被提倡为中国大气污染的规范控制措施。中国大气污染的直接原因是污染物排放超过空气环境的自净能力,这是由于中国经济发展模式不合理,不健康造成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号