...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research >FIRST AMONG EQUALS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE AND CHLORTHALIDONE ON RECENTLY DIAGNOSED HYPERTENSIVES
【24h】

FIRST AMONG EQUALS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE AND CHLORTHALIDONE ON RECENTLY DIAGNOSED HYPERTENSIVES

机译:第一个等式:氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮对最近诊断的高血压的影响的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Thiazide diuretics have been the first choice to treat stable, uncomplicated, essential hypertension; hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) beingthe most preferred. Another thiazide, chlorthalidone is available since long and is reported to be equally efficacious if not better in treating primaryhypertension.Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of HCTZ and chlorthalidone in the management of primary essential hypertension.Methods: We compared these two drugs in a randomized, single-blinded, intention to treat study. Participants with essential hypertension receivedeither chlorthalidone 12.5 mg OD or HCTZ 25 mg OD for a period of 12-week. The results were compared on the basis of 12 hourly ambulatoryblood pressure (BP) monitoring; fortnightly record of serum potassium, and failure of treatment (i.e., the need of additional antihypertensive drugor incrementation in the dose of thiazides).Results: Out of 114,44 in chlorthalidone group and 39 in HCTZ group completed our study. There was a significant mean fall in BP by ?11.89/?9.86in the morning time and by ?11.12/?7.56 in the evening time in group H receiving HCTZ 25 mg OD. In chlorthalidone group, this mean fall was by?16.45/?12.38 in the morning time and by ?15.73/?10.86 in the evening time. After 12 weeks, night time BP control was better in chlorthalidonegroup (127.91±5.01) than HCTZ (132.67±5.19) (p=0.001). Both drugs decreased serum potassium levels, but this decrease was marginally more withHCTZ (3.777±0.601 vs. 3.891±0.534), statistically non-significant when compared to each other (p>0.05).Conclusion: Chlorthalidone is better than HCTZ in controlling BP throughout the day without causing any significant complication.
机译:目的:噻嗪类利尿剂已成为治疗稳定,简单,原发性高血压的首选药物。最优选氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)。另一种噻嗪类药物氯噻酮已经存在很长时间了,据报道在治疗原发性高血压方面同样有效,即使不是更好。目的:比较HCTZ和氯噻酮在治疗原发性原发性高血压中的疗效和安全性。一种随机的,单盲的治疗研究意向。患有原发性高血压的参与者在12周内接受了1.25毫克的氯噻酮或25毫克的HCTZ。根据每小时12小时动态血压(BP)的监测结果进行比较;每两周记录一次血清钾含量和治疗失败情况(即需要额外的降压药或增加噻嗪类药物剂量)。结果:氯噻酮组114.44人,HCTZ组39人完成了本研究。接受HCTZ 25 mg OD剂量的H组,早晨BP的平均下降显着,为11.11 / 9.86,晚上为11.11 / 7.56。氯噻酮组的平均下降时间在早晨时为?16.45 /?12.38,在夜间时为?15.73 /?10.86。 12周后,氯噻酮组(127.91±5.01)的夜间血压控制优于HCTZ(132.67±5.19)(p = 0.001)。两种药物均降低了血清钾水平,但HCTZ的降低幅度较小(3.777±0.601 vs. 3.891±0.534),彼此相比在统计学上无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。结论:氯噻酮在控制血压方面优于HCTZ。全天不引起任何严重的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号