...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >The Optimal Cut-Off Level of The Fecal Immunochemical Test For Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Country with Limited Colonoscopy Resources: A Multi-Center Study from Thailand
【24h】

The Optimal Cut-Off Level of The Fecal Immunochemical Test For Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Country with Limited Colonoscopy Resources: A Multi-Center Study from Thailand

机译:结肠镜检查资源有限的国家中进行大肠癌筛查的粪便免疫化学测试的最佳截止水平:泰国的多中心研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Selecting the cut-off point for the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs is of prime importance. The balance between the test performance for detecting advanced neoplasia and the available colonoscopy resources should be considered. We aimed to identify the optimal cut-off of FIT for advanced neoplasia in order to minimize colonoscopy burden. Methods: We conducted a multi-center study in 6 hospitals from diverse regions of Thailand. Asymptomatic participants, aged 50-75 years, were tested with one-time quantitative FIT (OC-SENSOR, Eiken Chemical Co.,Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and all participants underwent colonoscopy. We assessed test performance in detecting advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma and CRC) and measured the burden of colonoscopy with different cut-offs [25 (FIT25), 50 (FIT50), 100 (FIT100), 150 (FIT150), and 200 (FIT200)ng/ml]. Results: Among 1,479 participants, advanced neoplasia and CRC were found in 137 (9.3%) and 14 (0.9%), respectively. From FIT25 to FIT200, the positivity rate decreased from 18% to 4.9%. For advanced neoplasia, an increased cut-off decreased sensitivity from 42.3% to 16.8% but increased specificity from 84.2% to 96.3%. The increased cut-off increased the positive predictive value (PPV) from 21.5% to 31.5%. However, all cut-off points provided a high negative predictive value (NPV) (>90%). For CRC, the miss rate for FIT25 to FIT 150 was the same (n=3, 21%), whereas that with FIT200 increased to 35% (n=5). Conclusions: In a country with limited-colonoscopy resources, using FIT150 may be preferred because it offers both high PPV and NPV for advanced neoplasia detection. It could also decrease colonoscopy workload, while maintaining a CRC miss rate similar to those with lower cut-offs.
机译:背景:为大肠癌(CRC)筛查程序选择粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)的临界点至关重要。应考虑在检测晚期赘生物的测试性能与可用的结肠镜检查资源之间取得平衡。我们旨在为晚期肿瘤确定最佳的FIT临界值,以最大程度地减少结肠镜检查的负担。方法:我们在泰国不同地区的6家医院进行了多中心研究。使用一次性定量FIT(OC-SENSOR,Eiken Chemical Co.,Ltd。,日本东京)对年龄在50-75岁之间的无症状参与者进行了测试,并对所有参与者进行了结肠镜检查。我们评估了检测晚期赘生物(高级腺瘤和CRC)的测试性能,并测量了不同截止值的结肠镜检查的负担[25(FIT25),50(FIT50),100(FIT100),150(FIT150)和200(FIT200 )ng / ml]。结果:在1479名参与者中,分别有137名(9.3%)和14名(0.9%)发现了晚期肿瘤和CRC。从FIT25到FIT200,阳性率从18%下降到4.9%。对于晚期肿瘤,截止值的增加将敏感性从42.3%降低到16.8%,而特异性从84.2%降低到96.3%。截止值的增加将阳性预测值(PPV)从21.5%提高到31.5%。但是,所有临界点均提供较高的阴性预测值(NPV)(> 90%)。对于CRC,FIT25到FIT 150的未命中率相同(n = 3,21%),而FIT200的未命中率增加到35%(n = 5)。结论:在结肠镜检查资源有限的国家,使用FIT150可能是首选,因为它既可提供高PPV值又可提供NPV值用于晚期赘生物检测。它还可以减少结肠镜检查的工作量,同时保持CRC漏检率与低截止值相似。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号