...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention >Performance Indices of Needle Biopsy Procedures for the Assessment of Screen Detected Abnormalities in Services Accredited by BreastScreen Australia
【24h】

Performance Indices of Needle Biopsy Procedures for the Assessment of Screen Detected Abnormalities in Services Accredited by BreastScreen Australia

机译:评估澳大利亚筛查所认可的服务中筛查异常的针头活检程序的性能指标

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: We wished to analyse patterns of use of needle biopsy procedures by BreastScreen Australia(BSA) accredited programs to identify areas for improvement. Design: BSA services provided anonymous dataregarding percutaneous needle biopsy of screen detected lesions assessed between 2005-2009. Results: 12 services,from 5 of 7 Australian states and territories provided data for 18212 lesions biopsied. Preoperative diagnosis rateswere 96.84% for lesion other than microcalcification (LOTM) and 93.21% for microcalcifications. At surgery97.9% impalpable lesions were removed at the first procedure. Of 11548 Microcalcification (LOTM) biopsied,46.9% were malignant. The final diagnosis was reached by conventional core biopsy (CCB) in 72.46%, FNAB in21.33%, VACB in 1.69% and open biopsy in 4.52% of lesions. FNA is being limited to LOTM with benign imagingAfter FNAB, core biopsy was required for 38% of LOTM. In LOTM the mean false positive rate (FPR) was0.36% for FNAB, 0.06% for NCB and 0% for VACB. Diagnostic accuracy was 72.75% for FNAB and 92.1% forcore biopsies combined. Of 6441 microcalcifications biopsied 2305 (35.8%) were malignant. Microcalcificationsare being assessed primarily by NCB but 6.57% underwent FNAB, 45.6% of which required NCB. False positivediagnoses were rare. FNR was 5% for NCB and 1.53% for VACB. Diagnostic accuracy was 73.52% for FNAB,86.29% for NCB and 88.63% for VACB. Only 8 of 12 services had access to VACB facilities. Conclusions: BSAservices are selecting lesions effectively for biopsy and are achieving high preoperative diagnosis rates. Gaps inthe present accreditation standards require further consideration.
机译:背景:我们希望分析经澳大利亚乳腺癌筛查(BSA)认可的计划进行的穿刺活检程序的使用模式,以找出需要改进的地方。设计:BSA服务提供了有关在2005-2009年间评估的经筛查的病变的经皮穿刺活检的匿名数据。结果:来自澳大利亚7个州和地区中的5个的12个服务提供了18212个活检病变的数据。除微钙化(LOTM)以外,病变的术前诊断率为96.84%,微钙化为93.21%。手术时,在第一次手术中去除了97.9%的无法触及的病变。在活检的11548个微钙化(LOTM)中,有46.9%为恶性。常规核心活检(CCB)占72.46%,FNAB占21.33%,VACB占1.69%,开放性活检占4.52%,可以达到最终诊断。 FNA仅限于具有良性成像的LOTM FNAB之后,38%的LOTM需要进行核心活检。在LOTM中,FNAB的平均假阳性率(FPR)为0.36%,NCB为0.06%,VACB为0%。 FNAB的诊断准确性为72.75%,核心活检的诊断准确性为92.1%。活检的2 304例微钙化2305(35.8%)为恶性。微钙化主要由NCB评估,但FNAB占6.57%,其中需要NCB占45.6%。假阳性诊断很少。 NCB的FNR为5%,VACB的FNR为1.53%。 FNAB的诊断准确性为73.52%,NCB为86.29%,VACB为88.63%。 12个服务中只有8个可以使用VACB设施。结论:BSA服务可以有效地选择病变进行活检,并且术前诊断率很高。当前认可标准中的空白需要进一步考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号