首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Silvicultural Research >Research and innovation in sustainable forestry: lessons learnt to inform the policy making community
【24h】

Research and innovation in sustainable forestry: lessons learnt to inform the policy making community

机译:可持续林业的研究和创新:为决策社区提供信息的经验教训

获取原文
           

摘要

From an already rich experience of cooperation between scientists and policy makers in the framework of international research institutions such as the International union of forest research organizations (IUFRO), the Center for international forest research (CIFOR) and the European Forest Institute (EFI), as well as through the promotion and development of EU research projects and programs, some lessons can be drawn considering the possible role of scientists at the science-policy interface. Today, on the example of the global change - and especially the climatic changes that policy makers are demanding about-, most of the researches to be carried out have to answer social questions the solutions of which require the support of science. This is especially the case in the forestry field, which is characterized by the particularly long term of cycles and the great number of stakeholders interested in. Whilst decision making processes are complex systems, science is not the only source of knowledge useful for taking decisions, so that in a democratic context, research results have to be confronted to other lessons learnt (for instance from technical expertise, or from traditional knowledge) in order to get accountability in terms of instrumentation. In scientific terms, it should certainly lead to multi-disciplinary approaches of the multifunctionality of forest and related techniques to be implemented. But this does not mean that research activities have to be assessed only against their instrumentality. However, research and public decision-making are very contrasting spheres, where the principles and professional types of behavior are basically different. This situation calls for a need for a clear separation of the respective roles. In addition, all scientific developments should not be driven from practical needs of decision-makers, since theoretical questions may indirectly build up the future reality.
机译:从国际森林研究组织联合会(IUFRO),国际森林研究中心(CIFOR)和欧洲森林研究所(EFI)等国际研究机构的框架内,科学家与决策者之间已经具有丰富的合作经验,以及通过促进和发展欧盟的研究项目和计划,可以借鉴一些经验教训,考虑科学家在科学与政策互动中可能发挥的作用。如今,以全球变化为例-尤其是决策者所要求的气候变化-,要进行的大多数研究必须回答社会问题,而解决这些问题的方法需要科学的支持。在林业领域尤其如此,其特点是周期特别长,并且利益相关者人数众多。虽然决策过程是复杂的系统,但科学并不是唯一可用于决策的知识来源,因此,在民主的背景下,研究结果必须面对其他经验教训(例如,从技术专长或传统知识中吸取的教训),以便在仪器方面承担责任。用科学的术语来说,它肯定会导致采用森林的多功能性和相关技术的多学科方法。但这并不意味着仅需根据研究手段对研究活动进行评估。但是,研究和公共决策是截然相反的领域,在这些领域中,行为的原则和专业类型基本上是不同的。这种情况需要明确区分各个角色。此外,所有的科学发展都不应以决策者的实际需求为动力,因为理论问题可能会间接建立未来的现实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号