...
首页> 外文期刊>Arab Journal of Urology >[45] Role of nephrometry scoring systems (R.E.N.A.L.-PADUA) in planning nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal masses: Retrospective study of 88 cases
【24h】

[45] Role of nephrometry scoring systems (R.E.N.A.L.-PADUA) in planning nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal masses: Retrospective study of 88 cases

机译:[45]肾功能评分系统(R.E.N.A.L.-PADUA)在计划肾肿块患者的保肾手术中的作用:88例回顾性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveTo assess the utility of nephrometry scoring systems (R.E.N.A.L.-PADUA) in planning nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) in patients with renal masses. NSS has become the standard for the management of localised renal masses; however, an objective preoperative evaluation is needed. The nephrometry scores role is preoperative evaluation of the complexity of partial nephrectomy (PN) and evaluation of possible postoperative complications, and these scores are not yet standardly used in many countries including Algeria.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of patients who underwent surgical treatment of renal masses between 2013 and 2016 for clinical renal tumours in the Urology Department of Annaba University Hospital, Algeria. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to define the clinical stage and anatomical characteristics of the tumours. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores were retrospectively assessed for each of the 88 patients. Uni- and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the correlations between age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, clinical tumour size, PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. complexity group categories, and grade of postoperative complications.ResultsWe noticed that only nine patients had NSS and all the others a total nephrectomy; however, 20 of them had a moderate complexity score for PN and seven a low complexity score. Then we compared with the results with the management in 2017 and 2018, the attitude was more liberal with the number of PNs greater than that of the 6?years previously.ConclusionA precise stratification of patients with both PADUA and R.E.N.A.L before nephrectomy is recommended to consider the potential threats and benefits of NSS. They are valuable tools to categorise renal tumours based on anatomical features and to prevent patients from abusive total nephrectomies conserving significant nephronic capital.
机译:目的评估肾病计分系统(R.E.N.A.L.-PADUA)在计划肾肿块患者的保肾手术(NSS)中的效用。 NSS已成为局部肾脏肿块管理的标准。但是,需要客观的术前评估。肾功能评分的作用是术前评估部分肾切除术(PN)的复杂性和评估可能的术后并发症,这些评分尚未在包括阿尔及利亚在内的许多国家/地区得到标准化使用。方法我们回顾性评估了接受手术治疗的患者的临床记录。阿尔及利亚安纳巴大学医院泌尿科的2013年至2016年的肾脏肿块。所有患者均接受术前计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像,以定义肿瘤的临床阶段和解剖特征。 PADUA和R.E.N.A.L.回顾性评估88例患者的得分。单因素和多因素分析用于评估年龄,性别,查尔森合并症指数,临床肿瘤大小,PADUA和R.E.N.A.L.结果我们注意到只有9例患者接受了NSS,所有其他患者均进行了全肾切除术。但是,其中20个具有PN的中等复杂性分数,而7个具有较低的复杂性分数。然后我们将其与2017年和2018年的管理结果进行比较,态度较宽松,PN数目大于之前的6年。结论建议对肾切除术前的PADUA和RENAL患者进行精确分层NSS的潜在威胁和利益。它们是有价值的工具,可根据解剖学特征对肾肿瘤进行分类,并防止患者滥用总肾小管切除术,从而节省大量肾病资本。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号