...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (So Paulo) >Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment
【24h】

Efficacy indicators of four methods in outpatient addiction treatment

机译:门诊成瘾治疗四种方法的疗效指标

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background In Portugal, as far as we know, there are no recent studies that evaluated the comparative efficacy of therapeutic modalities in addiction problems by reference to a holistic and psychosocial model of effectiveness. Objectives Using a sample of Portuguese patients in outpatient treatment for drug and alcohol abuse, this study aimed to examine if a combined treatment modality (group therapy with individual intervention) had greater overall efficacy when compared to other three types of treatment without group therapy. Methods This is a correlational and cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of patients (N = 254) from an outpatient treatment in the Intervention Service on Addictive Behaviors and Substance Dependence. At the time of data collection, the patients were attending four types of treatment, such as receiving intervention based on individual psychological counseling (n = 66); receiving individual psychiatric counseling (n = 68); receiving both individual psychological and psychiatric counseling (n = 102); and receiving not only individual counseling (i.e., psychology or psychiatry), but also attending group therapy (n = 18). Results Using MANOVA and Wilks?¢????s multivariate test criterion, there was a significant effect of treatment modality on the global efficacy, ???? = 0.88, F (9, 603) = 3.75, p < 0.0001. Examination of mean estimates indicated that patients in a combined therapeutic modality revealed more treatment involvement compared to patients in other therapeutic modalities without group therapy. Discussion The results obtained in this study highlight the importance of integrating interventions in a collaborative way. A combined therapeutic modality, adding group therapy, was associated with positive effects, such as more levels of peer support and involvement in treatment, and increasing the individual?¢????s probability to remain abstinent.
机译:摘要背景据我们所知,在葡萄牙,尚无最近的研究通过参照整体和社会心理有效性模型来评估成瘾问题中治疗方式的比较有效性。目的本研究以葡萄牙患者在门诊接受药物和酒精滥用的门诊治疗为样本,旨在研究与其他三种不采用团体治疗的治疗方法相比,联合治疗方式(采用个体干预的团体治疗)是否具有更大的总体疗效。方法这是一项相关性和横断面研究,使用来自上瘾行为和物质依赖性干预服务中门诊治疗的患者便利样本(N = 254)。在收集数据时,患者正在接受四种类型的治疗,例如接受基于个人心理咨询的干预(n = 66)。接受个人精神病咨询(n = 68);接受个人心理和精神病咨询(n = 102);并且不仅接受个人咨询(即心理学或精神病学咨询),还接受团体治疗(n = 18)。结果使用MANOVA和Wilks的多元检验标准,治疗方式对整体疗效有显着影响。 = 0.88,F(9,603)= 3.75,p <0.0001。均值估计的检验表明,与没有团体治疗的其他治疗方式相比,处于联合治疗方式的患者显示出更多的治疗参与。讨论本研究中获得的结果突出了以协作方式整合干预措施的重要性。组合的治疗方式,加上分组治疗,会带来积极的效果,例如更高水平的同伴支持和参与治疗,以及增加个体保持戒断的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号