...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences >Videofluoroscopy versus upper G.I. endoscopy: A comparative study as a diagnostic tool in patients presenting with dysphagia
【24h】

Videofluoroscopy versus upper G.I. endoscopy: A comparative study as a diagnostic tool in patients presenting with dysphagia

机译:影像透视与上部G.I.内窥镜:作为吞咽困难患者诊断工具的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objective: Dysphagia is a major symptom in many of the patients coming to the hospital. There can be various causes of dysphagia and its accurate diagnosis shows the way for the necessary treatment. Videofluoroscopy and upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy are the two most commonly employed primary investigating modalities in assessing dysphagia. The objective of the study was to compare videofluoroscopy and upper GI endoscopy and establish a primary diagnostic tool for assessment of dysphagia. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 20 patients presenting with dysphagia in a tertiary care hospital.They were evaluated both by videofluoroscopy and upper GI endoscopy. Patients were evaluated based on the accuracy of the findings obtained with both the tests and compared statistically. Results: Videofluoroscopy could successfully diagnose 83% of the cases with a positive cause of dysphagia whereas upper GI endoscopy could diagnose only 41% of the positive cases. Conclusion: This study shows that videofluoroscopy is an effective primary diagnostic tool for evaluating dysphagia.
机译:背景与目的:吞咽困难是许多入院患者的主要症状。吞咽困难可能有多种原因,其准确的诊断为必要的治疗提供了方法。影像透视和上消化道(GI)内窥镜检查是评估吞咽困难的两种最常用的主要研究方式。该研究的目的是比较荧光透视和上消化道内窥镜检查,并建立评估吞咽困难的主要诊断工具。材料与方法:前瞻性研究在一家三级医院对20例吞咽困难的患者进行了影像透视和上消化道内镜检查。根据通过两次测试获得的结果的准确性对患者进行评估,并进行统计学比较。结果:透视检查可以成功地诊断吞咽困难的阳性病例的83%,而上消化道内窥镜检查只能诊断阳性的吞咽困难的41%。结论:这项研究表明,视频透视检查是评估吞咽困难的有效主要诊断工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号