首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Biological Sciences >Comparison of the effectiveness of kick and sweep hand net and Surber net sampling techniques used for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples
【24h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of kick and sweep hand net and Surber net sampling techniques used for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples

机译:踢扫网和扫掠网与Surber网采样技术用于采集水生无脊椎动物样本的有效性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this work is to analyze the effectiveness of two widely used methods for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples: the semiquantitative kick and sweep (K&S) and quantitative Surber net (SN) techniques. Based on our data, the methods were fully comparable as regards analysis of the macroinvertebrate metrics most often used in ecological status assessment (sensitivity/tolerance parameters), while K&S was found to be more successful in the evaluation of biodiversity. Thus, both methods could be used for routine monitoring of the status of water bodies, according to the recommendation of the EU Water Framework Directive, while for research, K&S is more advanced. K&S is also more effective timewise for material collecting. SN sampling is a quantitative method and could thus be used in studies of aquatic ecosystem productivity.https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS160622087TReceived: June 22, 2016; Revised: August 26, 2016; Accepted: September 20, 2016; Published online: September 28, 2016How to cite this article: Tubi? B, Popovi? N, Rakovi? M, Petrovi? A, Simi? V, Paunovi? M. Comparison of the effectiveness of kick and sweep hand net and surber net sampling techniques used for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples. Arch Biol Sci. 2017;69(2):233-8.
机译:这项工作的目的是分析两种广泛使用的收集水生无脊椎动物样本的方法的有效性:半定量反冲和扫掠(K&S)和定量Surber网(SN)技术。根据我们的数据,就分析生态系统评估中最常使用的大型无脊椎动物指标(敏感性/耐受性参数)而言,这些方法是完全可比的,而K&S在评估生物多样性方面更为成功。因此,根据欧盟水框架指令的建议,这两种方法都可用于常规监测水体状况,而对于研究而言,K&S更为先进。 K&S在收集物料方面也更及时有效。 SN采样是一种定量方法,因此可以用于水生生态系统生产力的研究.https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS160622087T接收:2016年6月22日;修订日期:2016年8月26日;接受:2016年9月20日;在线发布:2016年9月28日如何引用本文:Tubi? B,波波维? N,拉科维? M,彼得罗维?阿西米? V,波诺维? M.踢网和扫网和Surber网采样技术用于收集水生大型无脊椎动物样品的有效性比较。 Arch Biol科学。 2017; 69(2):233-8。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号