...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences >Effectiveness of muscle energy technique and Mulligan's movement with mobilization in the management of lateral epicondylalgia
【24h】

Effectiveness of muscle energy technique and Mulligan's movement with mobilization in the management of lateral epicondylalgia

机译:肌肉能量技术和Mulligan运动带动在外侧上lateral痛治疗中的有效性

获取原文

摘要

Aim: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of muscle energy technique (MET) and mobilization with the movement of elbow in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia (LE). Settings and Design: This study was conducted in Global Hospitals and Health City, Chennai 100. Subjects were allocated into group A and B through simple randomization method and double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed. Materials and Methods: An interventional comparative study was conducted on 30 patients having LE. They were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Group A (n = 15) was treated using movement with mobilization, group B (n = 15) was treated with MET. Both groups received conventional treatment of therapeutic ultrasound, after corresponding interventions. Visual analog scale (VAS) and elbow functional assessment (EFA) scales were the outcome measures, respectively. Measurements were performed before the beginning of treatment, after 10 days and 3 weeks afterward. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and post-hoc analysis Bonferroni method were used to analyze measurements taken at baseline and follow-up at 10 th day and 3 rd week. Results: Subjects who received mobilization with movement showed a significant improvement in both VAS and EFA than the other group which received MET. Conclusion: We conclude that mobilization with the movement of elbow appears to be more effective manual technique in treating LE in comparison with MET.
机译:目的:评估肌肉能量技术(MET)和肘关节活动时动员对外侧上con骨痛(LE)患者的治疗效果。设置与设计:本研究在金奈100号全球医院和卫生城进行。通过简单随机方法将受试者分为A组和B组,并进行了双盲随机对照试验。材料和方法:对30名患有LE的患者进行了干预性比较研究。他们被随机分配到两组之一。 A组(n = 15)采用动员运动治疗,B组(n = 15)采用MET治疗。在相应的干预措施之后,两组均接受了常规治疗性超声波治疗。视觉模拟量表(VAS)和肘关节功能评估(EFA)量表分别是结果指标。在治疗开始前,10天后和3周后进行测量。使用的统计分析:使用ANOVA和事后分析Bonferroni方法分析基线和随访10天和3周的测量值。结果:运动动员的受试者显示VAS和EFA均明显优于另一组接受MET的受试者。结论:我们得出结论,与MET相比,随着肘部运动动员似乎是治疗LE的更有效的手动技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号