...
首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control >Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study
【24h】

Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study

机译:产ESBL大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的患者之间危险因素特征的差异:多中心案例比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Generic epidemiological differences between extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), are poorly defined. Nonetheless, defining such differences and understanding their basis could have strategic implications for infection control policy and practice. Methods Between 2009 and 2011 patients with bacteraemia due to ESBL-EC or ESBL-KP across all three acute hospitals in the city of Auckland, New Zealand, were eligible for inclusion. Recognised risk factors for ESBL bacteraemia were compared between species in a retrospective case-case study design using multivariate logistic regression. Representative isolates underwent ESBL gene characterisation and molecular typing. Results 170 patients and 176 isolates were included in the study (92 patients with ESBL-EC, 78 with ESBL-KP). 92.6% had CTX-Ms. 39% of EC were ST131 while 51% of KP belonged to 3 different STs (i.e. ST20, ST48 & ST1087). Specific sequence types were associated with specific hospitals for ESBL-KP but not ESBL-EC. Variables positively associated with ESBL-EC on multivariate analysis were: community acquired infection (odds ratio [OR] 7.9; 95% CI: 2.6-23.9); chronic pulmonary disease (OR 5.5; 95% CI: 1.5-20.1); and high prevalence country of origin (OR 4.3; 95% CI: 1.6-11.6). Variables negatively associated with ESBL-EC were previous transplant (OR 0.06; 95% CI: 0.007-0.6); Hospital 2 (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.7) and recent ICU admission (OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.07-0.9). Conclusions Differences in risk profiles between patients with ESBL-EC and ESBL-KP suggest fundamental differences in transmission dynamics. Understanding the biological basis for these differences could have implications for infection control practice. Tailoring of infection control measures according to ESBL species may be indicated in some instances.
机译:背景产生广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的大肠杆菌(ESBL-EC)和肺炎克雷伯菌(ESBL-KP)之间的通用流行病学差异定义不明确。尽管如此,定义这种差异并理解其基础可能对感染控制政策和实践具有战略意义。方法2009年至2011年间,在奥克兰市的所有三家急性医院中,因ESBL-EC或ESBL-KP导致的菌血症患者符合纳入标准。在回顾性案例研究设计中,使用多元逻辑回归分析比较了物种之间公认的ESBL菌血症危险因素。代表性分离株进行了ESBL基因表征和分子分型。结果研究共纳入170例患者和176株分离株(92例ESBL-EC患者,78例ESBL-KP患者)。 92.6%的人患有CTX-Ms。 EC的39%是ST131,而KP的51%属于3个不同的ST(即ST20,ST48和ST1087)。特定序列类型与特定医院的ESBL-KP相关,但与ESBL-EC无关。与ESBL-EC正相关的多变量分析变量包括:社区获得性感染(赔率[OR] 7.9; 95%CI:2.6-23.9);慢性肺部疾病(OR 5.5; 95%CI:1.5-20.1);以及高患病原籍国(OR 4.3; 95%CI:1.6-11.6)。与ESBL-EC负相关的变量是先前的移植(OR 0.06; 95%CI:0.007-0.6);医院2(OR 0.3; 95%CI:0.1-0.7)和最近的ICU入院(OR 0.3; 95%CI:0.07-0.9)。结论ESBL-EC和ESBL-KP患者之间的风险特征差异表明传播动力学的根本差异。了解这些差异的生物学基础可能会对感染控制实践产生影响。在某些情况下,可能会根据ESBL种类定制感染控制措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号