首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control >Clinical outcomes in patients admitted to a hospitalist service exposed to an antimicrobial stewardship program – a retrospective matched cohort study
【24h】

Clinical outcomes in patients admitted to a hospitalist service exposed to an antimicrobial stewardship program – a retrospective matched cohort study

机译:接受抗菌药物管理计划就医的住院患者的临床结局–一项回顾性配对队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Given global issues with antimicrobial resistance and a need to optimize antimicrobial usage, antimicrobial stewardship (AS) programs are becoming a necessary component of hospitals and are increasingly mandated worldwide. It is important to evaluate these programs with respect to relevant clinical outcomes. An AS program with a prospective audit and feedback service (PAF) of antimicrobial usage was initiated May 11, 2015 at our tertiary care center, for patients admitted under the hospitalist service. We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study. Patients assessed during the first year of this PAF were considered to be the exposed cohort and were compared to unexposed controls matched on gender, age and infectious diagnosis selected from patients who had been admitted under the hospitalist service prior to initiation of the PAF. Descriptive analysis was completed and a multivariate conditional logistic regression was performed to analyze differences between the exposed and control groups in terms of a composite endpoint of 30?day mortality, 30?day post hospital discharge mortality and hospital re-admission. A total of 348 patients were assessed and received PAF suggestions during the first year were compared to 827 matched control patients who did not receive PAF suggestions. Of 707 PAF suggestions made, the most common was to stop an antimicrobial (23%). A significantly lower (20.7% vs 28.8%, p?=?0.008) composite endpoint was found in the group exposed to the PAF (OR 0.71 95%CI 0.52–0.97). This difference persisted when only patients with PAF suggestions that were completely or partially accepted were considered (18.6% vs 28.5%, p?=?0.001) but was no longer significant when patients who had their ASP suggestions declined were analyzed (30.2% vs 26.7%, p?=?0.610). In this retrospective cohort study, patient admissions in which PAF recommendations were accepted had better clinical outcomes than matched historical controls managed in the absence of this AS service.
机译:鉴于全球抗菌素耐药性问题以及优化抗菌素使用的需求,抗菌素管理(AS)计划已成为医院必不可少的组成部分,并且在全球范围内受到越来越多的委托。评估这些程序的相关临床结果非常重要。 2015年5月11日,我们的三级护理中心针对患者的住院服务启动了一项AS计划,该计划包括抗菌药物使用的前瞻性审核和反馈服务(PAF)。我们进行了一项回顾性配对队列研究。在该PAF的第一年中评估的患者被视为暴露人群,并与性别,年龄和感染诊断相匹配的未暴露对照进行了比较,这些对照选自在开始PAF之前接受过住院治疗的患者。描述性分析已完成,并进行了多条件条件逻辑回归分析,以分析暴露组与对照组之间30天死亡率,出院后30天死亡率和再次住院的综合终点之间的差异。在第一年中,总共对348名患者进行了评估并接受了PAF建议,而未接受PAF建议的827例匹配对照患者进行了比较。在提出的707 PAF建议中,最常见的是停止使用抗菌剂(23%)。在暴露于PAF的组中,复合终点显着降低(20.7%比28.8%,p = 0.008)(OR 0.71 95%CI 0.52-0.97)。当仅考虑完全或部分接受PAF建议的患者时,这种差异仍然存在(18.6%比28.5%,p?=?0.001),但当分析ASP建议被拒绝的患者时不再显着(30.2%vs 26.7)。 %,p≥0.610)。在这项回顾性队列研究中,接受PAF建议的患者入院的临床结局要比没有此AS服务的配对历史对照更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号