...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Behavior and Cognition >Remembering Past Exchanges: Apes Fail to Use Social Cues
【24h】

Remembering Past Exchanges: Apes Fail to Use Social Cues

机译:记住过去的交流:猿类无法使用社交线索

获取原文

摘要

Nonhuman primates can remember events from their distant past. Furthermore, they can distinguish between very similar events by the process of binding. So far, research into long-term memory and binding has focused on the binding of contextual information, such as spatial surroundings. As such, we aimed to investigate if apes can bind and retrieve other types of information, specifically, social information. We presented great apes with three different object types; they learnt to exchange (via reinforcement) one of the object types with one experimenter and another type with a second, different, experimenter. The remaining object type was not reinforced by either of the experimenters. After a delay of two or ten weeks, we assessed the apes’ memory of which object type was exchanged with which experimenter. Additionally, we introduced a new experimenter to see if the apes could infer by exclusion that the remaining object type should be exchanged with the new experimenter. The apes successfully remembered which object types were exchanged, but failed to distinguish which object type was exchanged with whom. This failure to bind an object type to a specific person may have resulted from the apes learning to use a rule based on recency, as opposed to learning a conditional rule involving social information. However, results from a second experiment suggested they fail to incorporate social information even when no other information could guide successful performance. Our findings are consistent with research showing long-term memory in primates, but suggest that social information may not be bound in memory as readily as spatial or contextual information.
机译:非人类的灵长类动物可以记住远古时代的事件。此外,它们可以通过绑定过程来区分非常相似的事件。到目前为止,对长期记忆和绑定的研究集中于上下文信息的绑定,例如空间环境。因此,我们旨在研究猿类是否可以绑定和检索其他类型的信息,特别是社交信息。我们用三种不同的对象类型介绍了大猩猩。他们学会了与一位实验者交换(通过加固)一种对象类型,并与另一位实验者交换另一种对象类型。剩下的物体类型没有被任何一个实验者强化。延迟两到十周后,我们评估了猿与哪种实验者交换了哪种对象类型的记忆。此外,我们引入了一个新的实验者,以查看是否可以通过排除猿类推断出剩余的对象类型应与新的实验者交换。猿类成功地记住了交换了哪些对象类型,但未能区分与谁交换了哪种对象类型。这种将对象类型绑定到特定人的失败可能是由于猿类学习使用基于新近度的规则,而不是学习涉及社会信息的条件规则。但是,第二个实验的结果表明,即使没有其他信息可以指导成功的表现,他们也无法融合社交信息。我们的发现与研究表明在灵长类动物中具有长期记忆的研究相一致,但表明社会信息可能不像空间或背景信息那样容易地被记忆所束缚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号