首页> 外文期刊>Anthropology Matters Journal >The Scientific Community: Creating a Language to Deal with the ‘Everyday Geopolitics’ of Neoliberal ‘Transition’ in Post-Socialist Serbia
【24h】

The Scientific Community: Creating a Language to Deal with the ‘Everyday Geopolitics’ of Neoliberal ‘Transition’ in Post-Socialist Serbia

机译:科学共同体:创造一种语言来应对后社会主义塞尔维亚的新自由主义“过渡”的“日常地缘政治”

获取原文
       

摘要

In this article, I focus on the ways in which a particular group of people – astrophysicists in Belgrade, Serbia, alongside whom I conducted a year of ethnographic fieldwork in 2008 and 2009 – responded to the collapse of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. I argue that the conditions and effects of neoliberalising processes occurring in economic centres of the global world system affected scientists in Serbia before neoliberal modes of governmentality surfaced in this state. I pay particular attention to a trope I often came across, namely the reference to a supranational ‘scientific community’. I consider how this term was mobilised with reference to the context of scientific and economic isolation during a portion of the 1990s, when a trade embargo and sanctions preventing formal international collaborations shaped scientists’ everyday experiences. Yet, I argue, isolation also reflected the uneven distribution of opportunities for scientific endeavours emerging out of global neoliberalisation processes and resistance to them. Opportunities reached scientists in various parts of the former Yugoslavia at different speeds, a situation that was experienced as a hindrance for many scientists committed to living and working in the region. It is against this historical backdrop of isolation that I suggest scientists began to invoke their belonging to a supranational ‘scientific community’.
机译:在本文中,我着眼于特定人群-塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德的天体物理学家,以及我在2008年和2009年进行了为期一年的人种志调查的人-对南斯拉夫社会主义联邦共和国垮台的反应。我认为,在世界自由体系的新自由主义模式出现之前,在全球世界体系经济中心发生的新自由主义进程的条件和影响已经影响了塞尔维亚的科学家。我特别注意我经常碰到的错字,即提及超国家的“科学共同体”。我考虑在1990年代的某个时期,科学和经济孤立的背景下如何动员这个术语,当时贸易禁运和制裁阻止了正式的国际合作影响了科学家的日常经验。但是,我认为,孤立也反映了全球新自由化进程中出现的科学努力机会的不均分配以及对它们的抵抗。前南斯拉夫各地的科学家以不同的速度获得了机遇,这种情况对许多致力于在该地区生活和工作的科学家构成了阻碍。在这种孤立的历史背景下,我建议科学家们开始援引他们属于超国家的“科学共同体”的归属。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号