首页> 外文期刊>Analytical methods >Comparison of solvent extraction and thermal desorption methods for determination of volatile polyfluorinated alkyl substances in the urban atmosphere
【24h】

Comparison of solvent extraction and thermal desorption methods for determination of volatile polyfluorinated alkyl substances in the urban atmosphere

机译:溶剂萃取法和热解吸法测定城市大气中挥发性多氟烷基物质的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) are among emerging persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that are widely present in a variety of consumer products. The typical approach for determination of volatile PFASs in ambient air is based upon the high-volume active sampling and solvent extraction (method A), which suffers from the poor portability, high noise level and significant loss of low molecular weight analytes. All these limitations have restricted its application in urban regions, especially in residential areas when conducting source apportionment analysis. In this study, method A was compared with another approach using low-volume air sampling and thermal desorption (method B). In general, method B showed a better repeatability and recovery, while method A demonstrated a lower detection limit. Application of both methods in the outdoor urban environment of Singapore indicated a higher time resolution, higher portability and lower noise level of method B. With these advantages method B appeared to be more suitable for the quantitative analysis of targeted PFASs in regions with concentrated point and variable diffusive sources.
机译:多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是新兴的持久性有机污染物(POP),广泛存在于各种消费产品中。测定环境空气中挥发性PFAS的典型方法是基于高容量的主动采样和溶剂萃取(方法A),该方法具有便携性差,噪声水平高以及低分子量分析物大量损失的缺点。所有这些限制限制了它在城市地区的应用,尤其是在进行源分配分析时在住宅区。在这项研究中,将方法A与使用小体积空气采样和热脱附的另一种方法进行了比较(方法B)。通常,方法B表现出更好的重复性和回收率,而方法A表现出更低的检测限。两种方法在新加坡的室外城市环境中的应用表明,方法B的时间分辨率更高,携带性更高,噪声水平更低。方法B的这些优点似乎更适合于在集中点和高密度区域对目标PFAS进行定量分析。可变扩散源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号