首页> 外文期刊>Agronomy >Water Infiltration and Moisture in Soils under Conservation and Conventional Agriculture in Agro-Ecological Zone IIa, Zambia
【24h】

Water Infiltration and Moisture in Soils under Conservation and Conventional Agriculture in Agro-Ecological Zone IIa, Zambia

机译:赞比亚IIa农业生态区保护性耕作和常规农业下土壤的水分渗透和水分

获取原文
       

摘要

Conservation agriculture is often presented as being ‘climate smart’ due to anticipated increases in soil moisture. The extent of enhanced water availability in farmers’ fields is, however, poorly documented. This paper presents five data sets describing soil moisture in fields of small-scale conservation and conventional farmers in the Agro-ecological Zone IIa, Zambia. The data include (1) soil cover; (2) time required for visible soil surface saturation, ponding and initial runoff under artificial rainfall; (3) saturated water infiltration rates; (4) weekly soil moisture at six soil depths for two entire rain seasons; and (5) weekly rainfall in each field. Measurements were done for 15 pairs of comparable fields under conservation and conventional agriculture. Pairwise analysis showed significantly shorter time for surface saturation, ponding, and runoff in conservation fields compared to conventional fields. Saturated infiltration rates in riplines and basins of conservation fields were similar to rates in ploughed/hoed fields. Infiltration rates between riplines and between basins were 31–37% lower than those in ploughed/hoed fields. Soil moisture in riplines and basins of conservation fields was higher by an average factor of 1.08 down to 40 cm soil depth, whereas it was lower by an average factor of 0.89 between plant rows compared to fields under conventional tillage. Based on 34,000 soil moisture measurements from 0 to 60 cm depth over two seasons, soils in conservation fields contained a weighted average of 18.2% (vol.) water compared to 19.9% (vol.) in conventional fields ( p < 0.05). The results indicate that small-scale adopters of conservation agriculture are less ‘climate smart’ than conventional farmers in terms of water infiltration and soil moisture.
机译:由于预期的土壤水分增加,保护性农业通常被认为是“气候智能”。但是,关于农民田间可用水量增加的程度的文献很少。本文介绍了五个数据集,描述了赞比亚农业生态区IIa中小型保护区和常规农民的土壤湿度。数据包括(1)土壤覆盖; (2)在人工降雨下可见土壤表面饱和度,积水和初始径流所需的时间; (3)饱和水渗透率; (4)在整个两个雨季中,在六个土壤深度处每周进行一次土壤湿度测定; (5)每个领域的每周降雨量。在保护和常规农业下对15对可比较的田地进行了测量。成对分析显示,与常规田相比,保护田的表面饱和度,积水和径流时间显着缩短。保护区边坡线和盆地中的饱和渗透率与耕地/有色田地的渗透率相似。裂隙线之间和盆地之间的渗透率比耕地/带草田的渗透率低31–37%。与常规耕作相比,在40 cm的土壤深度下,保护区的流线和盆地的土壤水分平均高1.08倍,而在植物行之间,土壤水分低平均0.89倍。根据两个季节从0到60厘米深度的34,000份土壤湿度测量值,保护区土壤的加权平均水含量为18.2%(体积),而常规田地的水含量为19.9%(体积)(p <0.05)。结果表明,就水分渗透和土壤湿度而言,小规模的保护性农业采用者比传统农民的“气候智能”要少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号