...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Medicine and Surgery >Comparison of trans-anal endoscopic operation and trans-anal excision of rectal tumors
【24h】

Comparison of trans-anal endoscopic operation and trans-anal excision of rectal tumors

机译:经肛门内镜手术与经肛门切除直肠肿瘤的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background Trans-anal endoscopic operation (TEO) has developed to facilitate proper tumor location and ensure excision safely. Methods We reviewed 92 patients enrolled in our database between 2006 and 2014 who were diagnosed with early rectal tumors and who underwent conventional trans-anal excision (TAE) or TEO. Clinical data were collected prospectively to compare safety and feasibility between two techniques. Results Ninety-two patients underwent trans-anal local excision for lower rectal tumors. TEO and TAE were performed in 48 and 44 patients, respectively. Age, sex, and comorbidities were similar. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter (1.6?±?1.68?cm vs. 1.17?±?1.17, respectively). Tumor height, however, was higher in the TEO (7.46?±?3?cm) than the TAE group (3.84?±?1.88?cm, p??0.001). Four complications, perianal abscess, and two perforations, occurred in the TEO group, whereas no major complications occurred in the TAE. Seven patients (14.6%) underwent TEO underwent a salvage operation compared to only a single patient in TAE group (2.3%, p?=?0.039). Eight patients (17.4%) diagnosed with adenocarcinoma developed recurrence, four in each group. Disease-free survival was similar between groups (TEO – 41.8 months, 95% RI 39.4–44.1; TAE 79.7 months, 95% RI 72.2–87.3). However, more TAE patients (n?=?7, 15.9%) than TEO patients (n?=?2, 4.2%) underwent chemotherapy. Conclusions TEO treatment of local rectal tumors is safe and feasible and can achieve an adequate resection margin. Local recurrence was similar in both groups. However, the numbers of salvage operations and minor complications were higher in the TEO group. Highlights ? TEO is treatment modality of choice in addressing lower rectal lesions. ? Evolving of TEO technique facilitate higher standard of academic teaching. ? TEO has few drawbacks; first, long term learning curve; second, technique is demanding (through single port?+ narrow space). ? TEO has promising results in the field of surgical oncology with equivalent results to conventional surgery.
机译:背景技术经肛门内窥镜手术(TEO)的开发有利于正确定位肿瘤并确保安全切除。方法我们回顾了2006年至2014年间纳入数据库的92例经诊断为早期直肠肿瘤并接受常规经肛门切除(TAE)或TEO的患者。前瞻性收集临床数据以比较两种技术之间的安全性和可行性。结果92例患者因直肠下段肿瘤经肛门局部切除。 TEO和TAE分别在48和44例患者中进行。年龄,性别和合并症相似。肿瘤直径没有显着差异(分别为1.6?±?1.68?cm与1.17?±?1.17)。然而,TEO的肿瘤高度(7.46±±3?3cm)比TAE组的高(3.84±±1.88?cm,p <0.001)。 TEO组发生了4种并发症,即肛周脓肿和2次穿孔,而TAE没有发生重大并发症。与TAE组中只有一名患者(2.3%,p <= 0.039)相比,有7名(14.6%)接受了TEO的患者接受了挽救手术。被诊断患有腺癌的八名患者(17.4%)复发,每组四名。两组之间的无病生存期相似(TEO – 41.8个月,RI 39.4–44.1的95%; TAE 79.7个月,RI 72.2–87.3的95%)。然而,接受化疗的TAE患者(n = 7,15.9%)比TEO患者(n = 2,4.2%)多。结论TEO治疗局部直肠肿瘤安全可行,可取得足够的切除余量。两组的局部复发率相似。但是,TEO组的抢救手术次数和轻微并发症较高。强调 ? TEO是解决下直肠病变的首选治疗方式。 ? TEO技术的发展促进了更高水平的学术教学。 ? TEO几乎没有缺点。首先,长期学习曲线;其次,技术要求很高(通过单个端口+狭窄的空间)。 ? TEO在外科肿瘤学领域具有可喜的成果,与传统外科手术具有同等的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号