...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Medicine and Surgery >Total thyroidectomy: Conventional Suture Ligation technique versus sutureless techniques using Harmonic Scalpel or Maxium
【24h】

Total thyroidectomy: Conventional Suture Ligation technique versus sutureless techniques using Harmonic Scalpel or Maxium

机译:全甲状腺切除术:常规缝合结扎技术与采用谐波解剖刀或Maximum的无缝合技术

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives Harmonic Scalpel (HS) and Maxium (MAX) are surgical shears that enable simultaneous vessel sealing and tissue coagulation. This study compares the outcome of Total Thyroidectomy (TT) using Conventional Suture Ligation (CSL) technique versus (vs) two sutureless techniques; H S and MAX techniques in terms of safety, operative time, blood drainage volume, hospital stay and surgical complications. Study design This is a prospective observational cohort study. Setting This study was performed in AL-Karama Teaching Hospital/College of Medicine/University of Wasit/Iraq. Patients and methods This study was performed from June 2012 to 2015. A total of 80 patients, 60 patients were females and 20 patients were males (average/mean of age was 39/38 years). They underwent TT after been randomized into the following three groups: CSL group when Suture Ligation Technique was used, HS group when Harmonic Scalpel was used and MAX group when bipolar electrosurgery Maxium was used. Results The postoperative evaluation of operative time, blood drainage volume and surgical complications revealed no statistically significant differences between HS group & MAX group, but there were statistically significant differences between CSL group vs. HS and MAX groups. Operative time statistics showed significant differences between CSL vs. HS and MAX groups, 113?±?10.9?minutes (min), 93?±?13?min and 92?±?10.6?min respectively, p-value<0.001 and 95% confidence interval [CI] (92.3712, 101.6288). The postoperative blood drainage volumes were significantly different between the three groups: CSL group?=?150?±?12.7?ml, HS group?=?89?±?16.21?ml and MAX group?=?118?±?9.6?ml, P-value?=?0.046 and 95% [CI] (89.9932, 99.6068). Conclusions HS and MAX are safe, effective, and time-saving techniques. They are also associated with low blood loss and low complication rates. HS and MAX are good alternative techniques to CSL for thyroid surgery. Highlights ? HS and MAX are safe useful and fast alternatives to conventional techniques in total thyroidectomy. ? These two devices facilitate surgical procedures and cancel any need for clips and suture ligations. ? They significantly reduce operative time without increases in the amount of blood losses and hospital stay. ? Probably the only disadvantage of these two devices is the cost of the single-use devices.
机译:目的谐波解剖刀(HS)和最大(MAX)是可同时进行血管封闭和组织凝结的手术剪。这项研究比较了常规缝合结扎术(CSL)技术与(vs)两种无缝合技术的全甲状腺切除术(TT)的结果;在安全性,手术时间,引流量,住院时间和手术并发症方面采用H S和MAX技术。研究设计这是一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。设置这项研究是在AL-Karama教学医院/医学院/瓦西特大学/伊拉克进行的。患者和方法该研究于2012年6月至2015年进行。总共80例患者,女性60例,男性20例(平均/平均年龄为39/38岁)。他们被随机分为以下三组进行TT:使用缝合结扎技术的CSL组,使用谐波手术刀的HS组和使用双极电刀Maxium的MAX组。结果术后评估手术时间,引流量和手术并发症,HS组和MAX组之间无统计学差异,但CSL组与HS和MAX组之间有统计学差异。手术时间统计显示,CSL组与HS组和MAX组和MAX组之间有显着差异,分别为113?±?10.9?min(分钟),93?±?13?min和92?±?10.6?min,p值<0.001和95 %置信区间[CI](92.3712,101.6288)。三组的术后血液排出量显着不同:CSL组≥150±12.7ml,HS组≥89±16.21ml,MAX组≥118±9.6。 ml,P-值≥0.046,95%[CI](89.9932,99.6068)。结论HS和MAX是安全,有效和省时的技术。它们还与失血少和并发症发生率低有关。 HS和MAX是甲状腺手术中CSL的替代技术。强调 ? HS和MAX是全甲状腺切除术中传统技术的安全有用且快速的替代方案。 ?这两个装置有助于进行外科手术,并消除了对夹子和缝合结扎的任何需要。 ?它们可显着减少手术时间,而不会增加失血量和住院时间。 ?这两个设备的唯一缺点可能是一次性设备的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号