首页> 外文期刊>Agriculture & Food Security >To label or not to label: balancing the risks, benefits and costs of mandatory labelling of GM food in Africa
【24h】

To label or not to label: balancing the risks, benefits and costs of mandatory labelling of GM food in Africa

机译:贴标签或不贴标签:平衡非洲转基因食品强制标签的风险,收益和成本

获取原文
           

摘要

There seems to be growing controversy among interest groups worldwide about whether genetically modified (GM) foods need to be labelled. There are also growing concerns, particularly among civil society groups, about the potential danger of GM foods, for which labels are being demanded. Particularly in Africa, the issue of labelling GM foods requires attention due to the rapid growth of agricultural biotechnology initiatives. Using Kenya as a case study, and based on interviews with key agricultural stakeholders and a review of the literature, we present five points to consider in discussions on how the need for mandatory GM labelling should be assessed. This framework encompasses, and is underpinned by, important considerations about ethics, consumer autonomy, costs, stigmatization, feasibility and food security as they pertain to agricultural biotechnology.
机译:在全世界的利益集团之间,关于转基因食品是否需要加标签的争议似乎越来越多。特别是在民间社会团体中,人们也越来越关注转基因食品的潜在危险,因此需要标签。特别是在非洲,由于农业生物技术计划的迅速发展,转基因食品的标签问题需要引起重视。以肯尼亚为例,在与主要农业利益相关者的访谈和文献综述的基础上,我们在讨论如何评估强制性转基因标签的必要性时提出了五个要点。该框架包含与农业生物技术有关的道德,消费者自治,成本,污名化,可行性和粮食安全的重要考虑,并以这些考虑为基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号