首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Time Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Asthma Prevalence in the United States From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Study (1999–2011)
【24h】

Time Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Asthma Prevalence in the United States From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Study (1999–2011)

机译:从行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)研究(1999-2011年),美国哮喘患病中种族和种族差异的时间趋势

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives. We examined whether racial/ethnic disparities in the United States increased over time. Methods. We analyzed data from 3?868?956 adults across the United States from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 1999 to 2011. We used random intercepts models (individuals nested in states) to examine racial/ethnic disparities and time trends in asthma lifetime and its current prevalence, adjusted for covariates. We also investigated the heterogeneity in asthma prevalence by ethnicity of the major zone of residence. Results. Lifetime and current asthma prevalence were higher among non-Hispanic Black populations, with time trends highlighting increasing differences over time (b?=?0.0078; 95% confidence interval [CI]?=?0.0043, 0.0106). Lower odds ratios (ORs) of asthma were noted for Hispanic populations (OR?=?0.74; 95% CI?=?0.73, 0.76). Hispanics in states with more Puerto Rican residents reported greater risks of asthma (OR?=?1.55; 95% CI?=?1.24, 1.93) compared with Hispanics in states with larger numbers of Mexican or other ethnicities. Conclusions. Disparities in asthma prevalence by racial/ethnic groups increased in the last decade, with non-Hispanic Blacks and Puerto Rican Hispanics at greater risk. Interventions targeting asthma treatments need to recognize racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities. Asthma is a major public health issue in the United States that affected nearly 9.4% of the US population in 2009. 1 The burden of asthma morbidity has been borne by both patient households (productive days lost) and the health system (rising health care costs). 1,2 Most population studies on asthma have focused on the role of asthma biology (i.e., predisposition to developing asthma), the hygiene hypothesis (weakened immune defense in countries with higher rates of sanitation problems), and environmental hazards (pollutants both inside and outside the household, including air quality and smoking) in asthma morbidity. However, a small number of studies in the United States and other countries have indicated racial/ethnic and socioeconomic gradients for asthma outcomes among adults and children. 3 Studies have identified racial/ethnic minorities as being at greater risk for morbidity, 4–9 although the direction of these patterns has been disputed by others. 10–13 Studies on racial/ethnic disparities have explained the differences in asthma prevalence through 3 interconnected pathways. First, racial/ethnic differences in income and living standards may explain patterning of exposure to environmental hazards both inside and outside the household. 2,9,14,15 Living conditions within the household (quality of household, dust, and poor pest control) and exposure to air pollution (distance from highways or living in dense areas) may explain racial gradients in asthma to some extent. 2,3,9,11,14–17 Second, racial/ethnic differences in asthma may also be attributed to the patterns of stress (from material deprivation or sociocultural discrimination) that affect immune and allergic responses. 3,18–20 Evidence on this so far has been limited to a couple of critical time windows (pregnancy and postpregnancy), which may have a greater bearing on asthma risks. 20 Third, racial/ethnic disparities in access to regular health care may be another factor, affecting the development, continuation, and worsening of the asthma burden. 10,21,22 Although there is limited understanding of the racial/ethnic disparities in asthma outcomes, a major gap in the current research pertains to the knowledge of time trends in these disparities. Two studies, conducted before 2005, provided some information on changing patterns; both studies examined the changing gradients of hospitalizations and emergency department visits. 6,23 These study authors, Gupta et al. 6 and Ginde et al., 23 found widening Black–White differences in asthma exacerbations that led to hospitalizations. No other studies have examined asthma prevalence differences between racial/ethnic groups and disparities over time. Furthermore, although some researchers have claimed a “protective Hispanic effect,” 24–27 others have highlighted greater morbidity among specific ethnicities. 7,22,28–31 It is less established if this protective effect does exist and whether it extends to all major Hispanic ethnicities. We examined the racial/ethnic gradients and time trends in asthma lifetime and current prevalence in the United States by comparing non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic populations between 1999 and 2011. In addition, we assessed whether racial/ethnic differences over time persisted after accounting for socioeconomic status (SES) and the heterogeneity in asthma by major Hispanic ethnicities.
机译:目标。我们研究了美国的种族/族裔差异是否随着时间而增加。方法。我们分析了1999年至2011年美国行为危险因素监测系统中3,868,956名成年人的数据。我们使用随机截距模型(嵌套在各州的个体)检查了种族/族裔差异和哮喘一生中的时间趋势以及目前的流行程度,针对协变量进行了调整。我们还通过主要居住地区的种族调查了哮喘患病率的异质性。结果。非西班牙裔黑人人群的终生和当前哮喘患病率较高,时间趋势突显了随着时间的推移差异的增加(b = 0.0078; 95%置信区间[CI] = 0.0043,0.0106)。西班牙裔人群的哮喘患病几率(OR)较低(ORα=?0.74; 95%CI?=?0.73,0.76)。与墨西哥或其他种族较多的州的西班牙裔美国人相比,波多黎各居民较多的州的西班牙裔人罹患哮喘的风险更高(OR?=?1.55; 95%CI?=?1.24,1.93)。结论。在过去的十年中,种族/族裔群体的哮喘患病率差距有所增加,非西班牙裔黑人和波多黎各拉美裔人的患病风险更高。针对哮喘治疗的干预措施需要认识到种族,种族和地理上的差异。哮喘是美国的主要公共卫生问题,2009年影响了美国近9.4%的人口。1哮喘发病率的负担已由患者家庭(生产天数损失)和卫生系统(上升的医疗保健成本)承担。 )。 1,2大多数有关哮喘的人群研究都集中在哮喘生物学(即易患哮喘的倾向),卫生假设(在卫生问题发生率较高的国家中免疫防御能力弱)和环境危害(内部和外部污染物)方面的作用。家庭以外的人,包括空气质量和吸烟)的哮喘发病率。但是,美国和其他国家/地区的少量研究表明,成年人和儿童的哮喘结局具有种族/种族和社会经济梯度。 3研究表明,种族/族裔少数人患病的风险更高,4-9,尽管其他人对此模式的方向提出了质疑。 10-13种族/族裔差异研究通过3个相互关联的途径解释了哮喘患病率的差异。首先,收入和生活水平的种族/族裔差异可以解释家庭内部和外部遭受环境危害的方式。 2,9,14,15家庭的生活条件(家庭质量,灰尘和不良的虫害控制)和空气污染(远离公路或居住在人口稠密的地区)可能在一定程度上解释了哮喘的种族梯度。 2,3,9,11,14–17其次,哮喘的种族/种族差异也可能归因于影响免疫和过敏反应的压力模式(来自物质剥夺或社会文化歧视)。 3,18–20到目前为止,有关证据仅限于几个关键的时间窗(怀孕和怀孕后),这可能对哮喘风险有更大的影响。 20第三,在获得常规卫生保健方面的种族/种族差异可能是另一个因素,影响了哮喘负担的发展,持续和恶化。 10,21,22尽管对哮喘结局中种族/种族差异的了解有限,但当前研究的主要空白与这些差异的时间趋势知识有关。 2005年之前进行的两项研究提供了一些有关模式变化的信息。两项研究均考察了住院和急诊就诊梯度的变化。 6,23这些研究作者,Gupta等。 6和Ginde等人[23]发现,哮喘发作加重了黑人和白人之间的差异,导致住院治疗。没有其他研究检查过种族/族裔人群之间的哮喘患病率差异以及随时间的差异。此外,尽管一些研究人员声称具有“保护性的西班牙裔效应”,但其他[24-27]研究人员则强调特定种族之间的发病率更高。 7,22,28–31对于这种保护作用是否确实存在以及是否扩展到所有主要的西班牙裔种族,这一点尚无定论。通过比较1999年至2011年间非西班牙裔白人,非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔人口,我们研究了美国哮喘患者寿命和当前患病率的种族/种族梯度和时间趋势。此外,我们评估了种族/种族差异是否在考虑了主要西班牙裔种族的社会经济地位(SES)和哮喘异质性之后,随着时间的流逝,这一现象一直持续。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号