首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Indicators of Victimization and Sexual Orientation Among Adolescents: Analyses From Youth Risk Behavior Surveys
【24h】

Indicators of Victimization and Sexual Orientation Among Adolescents: Analyses From Youth Risk Behavior Surveys

机译:青少年被害和性取向的指标:来自青少年风险行为调查的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives. We used nuanced measures of sexual minority status to examine disparities in victimization and their variations by gender, age, and race/ethnicity. Methods. We conducted multivariate analyses of pooled data from the 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys. Results. Although all sexual minorities reported more fighting, skipping school because they felt unsafe, and having property stolen or damaged at school than did heterosexuals, rates were highest among youths who identified as bisexual or who reported both male and female sexual partners. Gender differences among sexual minorities appeared to be concentrated among bisexuals and respondents who reported sexual partners of both genders. Sexual minority youths reported more fighting than heterosexual youths, especially at younger ages, and more nonphysical school victimization that persisted through adolescence. White and Hispanic sexual minority youths reported more indicators of victimization than did heterosexuals; we found few sexual minority differences among African American and Asian American youths. Conclusions. Victimization carries health consequences, and sexual minorities are at increased risk. Surveys should include measures that allow tracking of disparities in victimization by sexual minority status. Public attention to and scholarship on sexual minority youths grew significantly during the past decade 1 ; victimization has been the subject of a great deal of this interest. Numerous studies have documented higher rates of victimization of sexual minority, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT), youths than of their heterosexual peers. Most previous studies relied on community samples or on samples of sexual minority youths recruited through LGBT organizations or online. Most notable among those is the biannual National School Climate Survey, conducted by the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, which has documented school-based victimization of LGBT youths for more than a decade. The 2011 survey of more than 7000 students, aged 13 to 21 years, showed that nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT students experience harassment at school. 2 Although a few population-based studies have examined victimization of sexual minority youths, these studies typically have several limitations. Some are limited to single-item measures of sexual minority status. 3 Experts argue that studies should measure multiple dimensions of sexual orientation (i.e., identity as well as behavior), 1 but studies that incorporate multiple measures are rare. Even in fairly large population-based samples, the prevalence of sexual minorities is low enough that LGB youths are combined into a single category for statistical analyses. 4,5 Multiple studies have documented strong gender differences in victimization among sexual minority youths: sexual minority adolescent boys report more victimization than do sexual minority adolescent girls. 5 Few studies have been able to disaggregate victimization experiences of sexual minority youths by age and race. A recent school-based population survey in Wisconsin found that homophobic attitudes decline from 7th to 12th grades. 6 Furthermore, analyses of the National School Climate Survey 2007 data showed that younger LGBT youths reported significantly more school victimization than did their older peers. 7 Data from the 2005 wave of the same survey showed that White, Native American, and multiracial LGBT students reported having property stolen or damaged at school more often than did other LGBT students. 8 Data from the 2007 wave of the survey showed that African American LGBT students were more likely than Whites to report anti-LGBT victimization at school. 7 This research from Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network was the first to show racial/ethnic group differences among LGBT students; we know of no published studies that make use of population-based data to examine racial/ethnic group differences in victimization. We used pooled Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) data to examine differences in indicators of victimization by sexual identity and sexual behavior, as well as variability among sexual minorities by gender, age, and race/ethnicity.
机译:目标。我们使用了对少数族裔身份的细微差别来衡量受害方面的差异及其随性别,年龄和种族/民族的差异。方法。我们对2005年和2007年青少年风险行为调查的汇总数据进行了多变量分析。结果。尽管所有性少数群体都报告说比异性恋者有更多的战斗,因为他们感到不安全,逃学以及财产被盗或损坏而逃学,但在被识别为双性恋或报告有男性和女性性伴侣的年轻人中,发生率最高。性少数群体之间的性别差异似乎集中在双性恋者和报告了两性伴侣的受访者中。性少数群体青年报告说,与异性恋青年群体相比,他们的战斗更多,尤其是在年轻年龄段,并且更多的非体育学校受害一直持续到青春期。与异性恋者相比,白人和西班牙裔性少数年轻人报告的受害指标更多。我们发现,在非洲裔美国人和亚裔美国人的年轻人中,几乎没有性别差异。结论。受害会对健康造成影响,而性少数群体的风险则更高。调查应包括可以追踪少数族裔身份在受害方面的差异的措施。在过去的十年中,公众对性少数青年的关注和奖学金显着增加1;受害一直是这种利益的主题。大量研究表明,与异性伴侣相比,性少数群体,或女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋和变性者(LGBT)的青年受害率更高。以前的大多数研究都依赖于社区样本或通过LGBT组织或在线招聘的性少数年轻人的样本。其中最引人注目的是由同性恋,同性恋和异性恋教育网络进行的半年两次的全国学校气候调查,该调查已记录了十几年来LGBT青年在校内受害的情况。 2011年对7000多名13至21岁的学生进行的调查显示,十分之九的LGBT学生在学校受到骚扰。 2尽管一些基于人群的研究已经检查了性少数年轻人的受害情况,但这些研究通常具有一些局限性。有些只限于少数群体性地位的单项指标。 3专家认为,研究应衡量性取向的多个维度(即身份和行为),1但结合了多种测量方法的研究却很少。即使在以人口为基础的相当大的样本中,性少数群体的患病率也很低,以至于LGB青年被合并为一个类别进行统计分析。 4,5多项研究表明,性少数族裔青年在受害方面存在很大的性别差异:性少数族裔青年男孩报告的受害率高于性少数族裔少女。 5很少有研究能够按年龄和种族来分类性少数年轻人的受害经历。威斯康星州最近一项基于学校的人口调查发现,同性恋的态度从7年级下降到12年级。 6此外,对《 2007年美国全国学校气候调查》数据的分析表明,年轻的LGBT青年报告的学校受害人数比年长的同龄人要多得多。 7来自同一次调查的2005年调查数据显示,白人,美国原住民和多种族的LGBT学生报告称,在学校被盗或损坏的财产比其他LGBT学生更为频繁。 8 2007年调查浪潮的数据显示,非洲裔美国LGBT学生比白人更有可能在学校报告反LGBT受害情况。 7同性恋,同性恋和异性恋教育网络的这项研究首次表明了LGBT学生之间的种族/族裔差异。我们知道尚无已发表的研究使用基于人口的数据来研究种族/族裔群体在受害方面的差异。我们使用汇总的青少年风险行为调查(YRBS)数据检查了性认同和性行为的受害指标,以及性别,年龄和种族/民族的性少数群体之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号