首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Public Health Research >Pediatric Modified Radical Mastoidectomy: Open Cavity versus Periosteal-Temporofascial Flap Obliteration: An Analysis
【24h】

Pediatric Modified Radical Mastoidectomy: Open Cavity versus Periosteal-Temporofascial Flap Obliteration: An Analysis

机译:儿科改良型根治性乳突切除术:开放腔与骨膜-颞颞面部皮瓣闭塞术的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Obliteration of the mastoid cavity leaves a smaller cavity with quicker as well as better healing. Chances of developing cavity granulations or infection are also reduced. Protection of the lateral semicircular canal by soft tissue obliteration also prevents vertigo episodes on exposure to cold air. This prospective study was to compare the results of pediatric modified radical mastoidectomy (MRM) in open mastoid cavities and cavities obliterated with periosteal-temporofascial swing flap at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara; a tertiary referral centre. The cohort comprised of 40 pediatric patients who underwent MRM between January 2012 and December 2014. They were divided into group 1 where mastoid cavity was kept open and group 2 where mastoid cavity was obliterated with periosteal-temporofascial swing flap plus medicated bone dust. Results in the 2 groups were assessed by comparing the time taken for mastoid cavity to become dry, incidence of vertigo on exposure to cold air, tympanic membrane graft status, mastoid cavity status and change in the pre-operative to post-operative pure tone average after 6 months. Statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Group 1 vs. Group 2 results were as follows: Mean time taken for mastoid cavity to dry was 81.8 days vs. 30.1 days. Vertigo on exposure to cold air was present in 77.3% vs. 0%. Tympanic membrane graft status was intact in 72.7% vs. 100%. Mastoid cavity epithelialization was complete in 68.2% vs. 94.4%. Mastoid cavity granulations were present in 36.4% vs. 5.6%. Mastoid cavity healing rates were 63.6% vs. 94.4%. Residual cholesteatoma was seen in 4.5% vs. 0%. Excessive wax & keratin debris was present in 36.4% vs. 5.6%. External auditory canal opening was adequate in 86.4% vs. 94.4%. The mean post-operative pure tone average was 37.61 dB vs. 25.97 dB. Mean gain in pure tone average was 8.94 dB vs. 19.84 dB. None of the patients developed intra-cranial complications. Periosteal-temporofascial swing flap plus medicated bone dust obliteration of pediatric MRM cavity provides a dry and healed cavity in less time with better hearing when compared to an open MRM cavity.
机译:乳突腔的闭塞使较小的腔具有更快以及更好的愈合。也减少了形成空腔肉芽或感染的可能性。通过软组织闭塞保护外侧半规管还可以防止暴露于冷空气中的眩晕发作。这项前瞻性研究旨在比较位于博克拉市Manipal教学医院的小儿乳突根治性开放乳突和经骨膜-颞肌筋膜瓣摆动闭塞的腔内小儿改良根治性乳突切除术(MRM)的结果。第三转介中心。该队列由40名在2012年1月至2014年12月间接受MRM治疗的儿科患者组成。他们分为第1组(保持乳突腔开放)和第2组(使乳突腔被骨膜-颞浅筋膜摆动皮瓣加药骨粉清除)。通过比较乳突腔变干所需的时间,暴露于冷空气中的眩晕发生率,鼓膜移植物状态,乳突腔状态以及术前至术后纯音平均变化的差异,评估两组的结果。 6个月后。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)16.0版进行统计分析。统计学显着性设定为p <0.05。第一组与第二组的结果如下:乳突腔干燥的平均时间为81.8天vs. 30.1天。暴露于冷空气中的眩晕症占77.3%,而0%。鼓膜移植物状态完整率为72.7%,而完整状态为100%。乳突腔上皮形成率分别为68.2%和94.4%。乳突腔颗粒的发生率为36.4%,而5.6%。乳突腔的治愈率为63.6%,而同期为94.4%。残余胆脂瘤的发生率为4.5%vs. 0%。蜡和角蛋白碎片过多的比例为36.4%,而5.6%。外耳道开放率分别为86.4%和94.4%。术后平均纯音平均水平为37.61 dB,而平均为25.97 dB。纯音平均的平均增益为8.94 dB和19.84 dB。没有患者发生颅内并发症。与开放式MRM腔相比,小儿MRM腔的骨膜颞颞面肌瓣加药性骨尘闭塞术可在更短的时间内提供干燥和愈合的腔,并具有更好的听力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号