首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Safety Belt Laws and Disparities in Safety Belt Use Among US High-School Drivers
【24h】

Safety Belt Laws and Disparities in Safety Belt Use Among US High-School Drivers

机译:美国高校驾驶员在安全带使用上的安全带法律和差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives. We compared reported safety belt use, for both drivers and passengers, among teenagers with learner’s permits, provisional licenses, and unrestricted licenses in states with primary or secondary enforcement of safety belt laws. Methods. Our data source was the 2006 National Young Driver Survey, which included a national representative sample of 3126 high-school drivers. We used multivariate, log-linear regression analyses to assess associations between safety belt laws and belt use. Results. Teenaged drivers were 12% less likely to wear a safety belt as drivers and 15% less likely to wear one as passengers in states with a secondary safety belt law than in states with a primary law. The apparent reduction in belt use among teenagers as they progressed from learner to unrestricted license holder occurred in only secondary enforcement states. Groups reporting particularly low use included African American drivers, rural residents, academically challenged students, and those driving pickup trucks. Conclusions. The results provided further evidence for enactment of primary enforcement provisions in safety belt laws because primary laws are associated with higher safety belt use rates and lower crash-related injuries and mortality. Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death and acquired disability for teenagers in the United States, 1 and lack of safety belt use is a major contributing factor for injury. 2,3 Strong evidence indicates that safety belt laws are among the most important interventions in increasing safety belt use. 4 Safety belt laws have been enacted by states since 1984 and vary in the nature of their provisions. 5 In 2006, only 25 states and the District of Columbia had primary enforcement laws in effect: nonuse of a safety belt was considered a primary offense, and the law permitted police to stop motorists solely for not using a safety belt. The remaining 24 states with safety belt laws considered nonuse of a safety belt a secondary offense and permitted police to issue a ticket for belt nonuse only if the vehicle was stopped for another offense, such as speeding. New Hampshire was the only state with no safety belt law. As of March 2012, 17 US states still have secondary safety belt laws in effect, and New Hampshire still has no safety belt law at all. 6 Previous research has shown that primary safety belt laws are associated with higher safety belt use and lower crash-related injuries and mortality in the general population as compared with secondary laws. 7–17 Few studies have examined the effect of primary versus secondary enforcement safety belt laws on belt use behavior and injury outcomes in teenagers. Such a specific study is warranted because of the lack of studies on the association between graduated driver licensing stages and safety belt use in the United States, and effective policies might be needed to increase use. Previous studies have reported higher belt use by teenaged passengers in primary than in secondary enforcement states, 18–20 but no studies have examined the association in novice teenaged drivers. Self-reported safety belt use increased between 1986 and 2000 among high-school 12th grade students in states with secondarily enforced safety belt laws. 21 In addition, mandatory safety belt laws adopted by US states between 1991 and 2005 have been associated with lower deaths and serious injuries and higher safety belt use among high-school students when riding as passengers. 19 The current study extended this line of research by establishing the association between safety belt law provisions and both teenaged passengers and teenaged drivers. It is particularly important to know how the prevalence of safety belt use among teenagers varies as they progress through the licensing process, from learners—who are supervised at all times by adults in the vehicles—to unrestricted, fully licensed drivers, and how this is associated with the enforcement status of state safety belt laws. Because teenaged drivers are most likely to crash in the first months after licensure, 22,23 wearing safety belts at the time of the crash is of great importance to reduce the severity or incidence of injury. Because reported safety belt use is higher among drivers than among passengers, 24–28 the aim of this study was to compare reported safety belt use, both as drivers and as passengers, among novice teenaged learners and among provisional and unrestricted teenaged drivers in primary versus secondary enforcement states.
机译:目标。我们比较了在具有主要或次要执行安全带法律的州中,获得学习许可证,临时许可证和无限制许可证的青少年中,驾驶员和乘客使用安全带的情况。方法。我们的数据来源是2006年全国青年驾驶员调查,其中包括3126名高中驾驶员的全国代表性样本。我们使用多元,对数线性回归分析来评估安全带法律与安全带使用之间的关联。结果。与具有主要法律的州相比,在具有次要安全带法的州,未成年驾驶员的安全带佩戴者的可能性要低12%,在乘客中系安全带的可能性要低15%。当青少年从学习者发展为不受限制的许可证持有者时,皮带使用的明显减少仅发生在二级执法国家。报告使用率特别低的人群包括非裔美国人驾驶员,农村居民,有学问的学生以及驾驶皮卡车的人群。结论。结果为在安全带法律中制定主要执法规定提供了进一步的证据,因为主要法律与更高的安全带使用率和更低的与撞车相关的伤害和死亡率相关。在美国,机动车撞车是导致死亡和后天致残的主要原因,[1]缺乏安全带是造成伤害的主要原因。 2,3有力的证据表明,安全带法律是增加安全带使用量的最重要干预措施之一。 4国家自1984年以来制定了安全带法律,其规定的性质有所不同。 5 2006年,只有25个州和哥伦比亚特区实施了主要的执法法律:不使用安全带被视为主要罪行,法律允许警察仅由于不使用安全带而阻止驾驶员。其余有安全带法律的24个州将不使用安全带视为次要罪行,并允许警察仅在车辆因其他违法行为(例如超速)而停车时才签发不使用安全带的罚单。新罕布什尔州是唯一没有安全带法律的州。截至2012年3月,美国有17个州仍在实施次要安全带法律,而新罕布什尔州根本没有任何安全带法律。 6先前的研究表明,与次要法律相比,普通人群的主要安全带法律与更高的安全带使用率和更低的与碰撞相关的伤害和死亡率相关。 7–17很少有研究检查主要和次要安全带法律对青少年安全带使用行为和伤害后果的影响。之所以需要进行这样的具体研究,是因为在美国缺乏关于分级驾驶执照阶段与安全带使用之间的关联的研究,并且可能需要有效的政策来增加使用。先前的研究报道,在初级执法中,青少年乘客使用安全带的比例高于中等执法国家(18-20),但是没有研究检查青少年驾驶员中的安全带关联性。自1986年至2000年,在安全带法律得到第二次实施的州中,高中12年级学生自我报告的安全带使用量有所增加。 21此外,美国各州在1991年至2005年间通过的强制性安全带法律与高中学生乘车时减少死亡和重伤以及增加安全带使用率有关。 19当前的研究通过建立安全带法律规定与未成年人乘客和未成年人驾驶员之间的联系来扩展了这一研究范围。尤其重要的是,要了解青少年在驾照过程中使用安全带的普遍程度如何变化,从学习者(由成人在车辆中始终监督)到无限制,完全执照的驾驶员,以及这种情况如何。与国家安全带法律的执行状态有关。由于十几岁的驾驶员最有可能在获得执照后的头几个月内发生撞车事故,因此,在撞车时应佩戴22,23系安全带,对于降低伤害的严重程度或发生率至关重要。由于报告的驾驶员之间的安全带使用率高于乘客,因此本研究的目的是比较初学者和未限制的青少年驾驶员(无论初学者还是初学者)中作为驾驶员和乘客使用的报告的安全带使用情况(24-28)次要执行状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号