首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics >Evaluation of Techniques for Univariate Normality Test Using Monte Carlo Simulation
【24h】

Evaluation of Techniques for Univariate Normality Test Using Monte Carlo Simulation

机译:基于蒙特卡洛模拟的单变量正态性检验技术评估

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper examines the sensitivity of nine normality test statistics; W/S, Jaque-Bera, Adjusted Jaque-Bera, D'Agostino, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, Ryan-Joiner, Lilliefors' and Anderson Darlings test statistics, with a view to determining the effectiveness of the techniques to accurately determine whether a set of data is from normal distribution or not. Simulated data of sizes 5, 10, ..., 100 is used for the study and each test is repeated 100 times for increased reliability. Data from normal distributions (N (2, 1) and N (0, 1)) and non-normal distributions (asymmetric and symmetric distributions: Weibull, Chi-Square, Cauchy and t-distributions) are simulated and tested for normality using the nine normality test statistics. To ensure uniformity of results, one statistical software is used in all the data computations to eliminate variations due to statistical software. The error rate of each of the test statistic is computed; the error rate for the normal distribution is the type I error and that for non-normal distribution is type II error. Power of test is computed for the non-normal distributions and use to determine the strength of the methods. The ranking of the nine normality test statistics in order of superiority for small sample sizes is; Adjusted Jarque-Bera, Lilliefor's, D'Agostino, Ryan-Joiner, Shapiro-Francia, Shapiro-Wilk, W/S, Jarque-Bera and Anderson-Darling test statistics while for large sample sizes, we have; D'Agostino, Ryan-Joiner, Shapiro-Francia, Jarque-Bera, Anderson-Darling, Lilliefor's, Adjusted Jarque-Bera, Shapiro-Wilk and W/S test statistics. Hence, only D'Agostino test statistic is classified as Uniformly Most Powerful since it is effective for both small and large sample sizes. Other methods are Locally Most Powerful. Shapiro-Francia, an improvement of Shapiro-Wilk is more sensitive for both small and large samples, hence should replace Shapiro-Wilk while the Adjsted Jarque-Bera and the Jarque-Bera should both be retained for small and large samples respectively.
机译:本文研究了九种正态检验统计量的敏感性。 W / S,Jaque-Bera,调整后的Jaque-Bera,D'Agostino,Shapiro-Wilk,Shapiro-Francia,Ryan-Joiner,Lilliefors'和Anderson Darlings测试统计数据,旨在确定准确确定技术的有效性一组数据是否来自正态分布。大小为5、10,...,100的模拟数据用于研究,每个测试重复100次以提高可靠性。来自正态分布(N(2,1)和N(0,1))和非正态分布(非对称和对称分布:Weibull,卡方,柯西和t分布)的数据经过模拟和测试,使用九项正常性检验统计数据。为了确保结果的一致性,在所有数据计算中都使用一个统计软件来消除由于统计软件引起的变化。计算每个测试统计的错误率;正态分布的错误率是I型错误,非正态分布的错误率是II型错误。计算非正态分布的测试功效,并用于确定方法的强度。小样本量的九个正态性检验统计量的优劣等级为;调整了Jarque-Bera,Lilliefor's,D'Agostino,Ryan-Joiner,Shapiro-Francia,Shapiro-Wilk,W / S,Jarque-Bera和Anderson-Darling检验统计数据,而对于大样本量,我们有; D'Agostino,Ryan-Joiner,Shapiro-Francia,Jarque-Bera,Anderson-Darling,Lilliefor's,调整后的Jarque-Bera,Shapiro-Wilk和W / S测试统计数据。因此,只有D'Agostino测试统计量被归类为“最一致”,因为它对大小样本均有效。其他方法是本地最强大的。 Shapiro-Francia,对Shapiro-Wilk的改进对小样本和大样本都比较敏感,因此应替换Shapiro-Wilk,同时应分别保留Adjsted Jarque-Bera和Jarque-Bera的小样本和大样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号