首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >The Association Between Sexual Orientation Identity and Behavior Across Race/Ethnicity, Sex, and Age in a Probability Sample of High School Students
【24h】

The Association Between Sexual Orientation Identity and Behavior Across Race/Ethnicity, Sex, and Age in a Probability Sample of High School Students

机译:高中学生概率样本中种族/族裔,性别和年龄之间的性取向认同与行为之间的关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives. We examined the prevalence and associations between behavioral and identity dimensions of sexual orientation among adolescents in the United States, with consideration of differences associated with race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Methods. We used pooled data from 2005 and 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Surveys to estimate prevalence of sexual orientation variables within demographic sub-groups. We used multilevel logistic regression models to test differences in the association between sexual orientation identity and sexual behavior across groups. Results. There was substantial incongruence between behavioral and identity dimensions of sexual orientation, which varied across sex and race/ethnicity. Whereas girls were more likely to identify as bisexual, boys showed a stronger association between same-sex behavior and a bisexual identity. The pattern of association of age with sexual orientation differed between boys and girls. Conclusions. Our results highlight demographic differences between 2 sexual orientation dimensions, and their congruence, among 13- to 18-year-old adolescents. Future research is needed to better understand the implications of such differences, particularly in the realm of health and health disparities. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently called for increased data collection on the lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) community in population health studies. 1 Although numerous studies have identified sexual orientation health disparities among youths, 2–9 researchers have only more recently begun to question if there is variation in prevalence of health outcomes among LGB populations depending on which dimension of sexual orientation is used (i.e., identity, behavior, or attraction). 10 Sexual orientation is a multidimensional construct, 11,12 and how it is measured changes the prevalence of nonheterosexual orientations. 13,14 Large studies of probability samples of youths typically only include 1 item assessing a single dimension of sexual orientation, 15 and, therefore, it is important to understand the level of congruency across these items. The IOM report also called for the use of an intersectional perspective, which is one that recognizes an individual’s co-occurring social identities and how they interact with sexual orientation. 1 Along these lines, there is much interest in the basic question of how different dimensions of sexual orientation are interrelated and if these relationships vary across development, sex, and race/ethnicity. 11,12,16 Understanding how various dimensions of sexual orientation are interrelated, and if this varies across demographic groups, has important implications for our basic understanding of the development of sexual orientation and its measurement in future adolescent health research. There is a growing body of research on incongruence between sexual orientation identity and sexual behaviors. 13,17,18 A Canadian study found that 12% of 1878 adolescents endorsed at least 1 dimension of nonheterosexuality. 13 Of these students, discrepancies were evident in their reports of sexual identity, attraction, and behavior; the majority only selected a single item (62%) whereas only 15% endorsed all items. The second-largest group (35%) was youths who reported same-sex attractions but no same-sex behavior or minority identity labels. From a developmental perspective it is important to recognize that sexual attractions typically emerge during early adolescence, whereas sexual behavior and internal adoption of identity labels occur during middle-to-late adolescence. 11 These patterns reflect the complexity in researching youths’ sexual orientation as adolescents’ identity may be in flux and opportunities for sexual expression may not exist. 11,12 A number of studies have found that girls are more likely to adopt both-sex–oriented identities (i.e., bisexual or mostly heterosexual) and to report same-sex attraction and same-sex sexual behavior. 13,19,20 Studies have also found lower levels of congruence between identity and behavior among adult women compared with men, 21,22 leading some to hypothesize that female sexual orientation is more fluid or plastic. 23,24 Studies of sex differences in sexual orientation stability across development have not been fully supportive of this hypothesis as results have been inconsistent, with some studies finding greater stability of identity among sexual-minority girls, 25,26 no sex differences among sexual minorities, 27 or that it depends on sexual orientation. 20 There has been limited research on how the experience of being LGB varies across racial or ethnic groups. Lack of significant differences in the timing of psychosexual milestones or in sexual identity formation among Black, Asian, Latino, and White youths has been reported, 28–30 whereas others have found differences. 31,32 Factors such as internalized homophobia, perceptions of rejection, and limited availability of support resources have been hypothesi
机译:目标。我们考虑了与种族/族裔,性别和年龄相关的差异,研究了美国青少年性取向的行为和身份维度的普遍性和关联性。方法。我们使用来自2005年和2007年的青少年风险行为调查的汇总数据来估计人口统计子群体中性取向变量的普遍性。我们使用多级Logistic回归模型来测试跨群体的性取向认同和性行为之间的关联差异。结果。在性取向的行为和身份维度之间存在很大的不一致,这在性别和种族/民族之间各不相同。尽管女孩更有可能被识别为双性恋,但男孩在同性行为和双性恋身份之间表现出更强的联系。男孩和女孩的年龄与性取向的关联方式不同。结论。我们的结果强调了13至18岁青少年在2个性取向维度之间的人口统计学差异以及他们的一致性。需要进行进一步的研究,以更好地理解这种差异的含义,特别是在健康和健康差异方面。医学研究所(IOM)最近呼吁在人群健康研究中增加有关女同性恋,双性恋和双性恋(LGB)社区的数据收集。 1尽管许多研究已经确定了年轻人之间的性取向健康差异,但是2–9研究人员才刚刚开始质疑,根据使用性取向的维度(即,身份,行为或吸引力)。 10性取向是一个多维的结构11,12,而性取向的测量方式会改变非异性取向的患病率。 13,14对年轻人的概率样本进行的大型研究通常仅包含一项评估一个性取向维度的项目,15因此,了解这些项目的一致性水平很重要。 IOM报告还呼吁使用交叉视角,该视角可以识别一个人的共同出现的社会身份以及他们与性取向的相互作用。 1沿着这些思路,人们对以下基本问题非常感兴趣:基本的问题是性取向的各个方面如何相互关联,以及这些关系在发展,性别和种族/民族之间是否存在差异。 11,12,16了解性取向的各个方面是如何相互关联的,并且如果这在不同的人口群体中有所不同,则对我们对性取向的发展及其在未来青少年健康研究中的测量方法的基本理解具有重要的意义。关于性取向认同与性行为之间不一致的研究越来越多。 13,17,18加拿大的一项研究发现,在1878年的青少年中,有12%的人认可了至少一维非异性恋。 13这些学生的性认同,吸引力和行为报告存在差异。大多数人只选择了一个项目(62%),而只有15%认可了所有项目。第二大组(35%)是报告了同性吸引力但没有同性行为或少数群体身份标签的年轻人。从发展的角度来看,重要的是要认识到性吸引力通常会在青春期早期出现,而性行为和内部使用的身份标签会在青春期中后期发生。 11这些模式反映了研究青少年性取向的复杂性,因为青少年的身份可能会不断变化,而性表达的机会可能不存在。 11,12多项研究发现,女孩更有可能采用两性取向的身份(即双性恋或主要是异性恋),并报告同性吸引和同性性行为。 [13,19,20]研究还发现,成年女性的身份和行为之间的一致性低于男性[21,22],这导致一些人认为女性的性取向更加流畅或可塑性。 23,24在整个发展过程中,性取向稳定性方面的性别差异研究并未完全支持这一假设,因为结果不一致,一些研究发现少数族裔女孩的身份稳定性更高,25,26少数族裔之间没有性别差异。 27岁,或者这取决于性取向。 20关于LGB经历在各个种族或族裔群体之间如何变化的研究很少。据报道,黑人,亚裔,拉丁裔和白人青年在性倾向里程碑的时间安排或性认同形成方面没有显着差异[28-30],而其他人则发现差异。 31,32假设有内部恐惧症,拒绝感和支持资源有限等因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号