首页> 外文期刊>Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology >Sublingual immunotherapy tablet for the treatment of house dust mite allergic rhinitis in Canada: an alternative to minimize treatment costs?
【24h】

Sublingual immunotherapy tablet for the treatment of house dust mite allergic rhinitis in Canada: an alternative to minimize treatment costs?

机译:加拿大舌下免疫治疗片用于治疗屋尘螨过敏性鼻炎:将治疗费用降至最低的替代方法?

获取原文
           

摘要

A cost-minimization analysis (CMA) was performed to estimate the economic impact of introducing the SQ house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy (SQ HDM SLIT)-tablet marketed as ACARIZAX? (regulatory approval May 2017) for the treatment of HDM-induced allergic rhinitis in Canada (Ontario and Quebec), where house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy (HDM SCIT) is already an available treatment option. A CMA was deemed appropriate and was based on the assumption that the SQ HDM SLIT-tablet has comparable efficacy to HDM SCIT. A societal perspective was adopted in the model, including relevant costs of medications, health care services and productivity loss. A 3?year time horizon was used corresponding to a recommended treatment course of allergy immunotherapy. Resource use and costs were based on published sources, where possible, and validated and complemented by a Canadian specialist clinician (allergist) in active practice in Ontario and in Quebec, respectively, where applicable. A discount rate of 1.5% was applied in accordance with the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) guidelines. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity analyses were performed by testing alternative assumptions for selected parameters, to understand their impact on the results of the analysis. The direct treatment costs for a 3-year treatment with SQ HDM SLIT-tablets were higher than for HDM SCIT for both provinces, Ontario and Quebec ($4732.12 and $4829.03 vs. $3434.51 and $2987.74). However, when adding the indirect costs to the model, total savings for the treatment with SQ HDM SLIT-tablets of $1833.00 for Ontario and $769.03 for Quebec were observed. Sensitivity analyses with varying HDM SCIT resource use, discount rates, titration and maintenance injections, nurse time, and number of injections per vial resulted in savings of SQ HDM SLIT-tablets over HDM SCIT in all scenarios analysed. The CMA indicates that SQ HDM SLIT-tablets are a cost-minimizing alternative to HDM SCIT when considered from a societal perspective in Ontario and Quebec.
机译:进行了成本最小化分析(CMA),以估算引入市售ACARIZAX?的SQ屋尘螨舌下免疫疗法(SQ HDM SLIT)片剂的经济影响。 (2017年5月监管批准)在加拿大(安大略省和魁北克)治疗HDM引起的过敏性鼻炎,那里尘螨皮下免疫治疗(HDM SCIT)已经成为可用的治疗选择。 CMA被认为是适当的,并且基于SQ HDM SLIT片剂具有与HDM SCIT相当的功效的假设。该模型采用了社会观点,包括药物,卫生保健服务和生产力损失的相关费用。推荐的过敏性免疫治疗疗程为3年。资源使用和成本基于可能的公开来源,并在可行的情况下分别由在安大略省和魁北克省积极开展活动的加拿大专业临床医生(过敏症专家)进行验证和补充。根据加拿大卫生与药物技术局(CADTH)的指导方针,折现率为1.5%。为了评估结果的稳健性,通过测试所选参数的替代假设来进行敏感性分析,以了解其对分析结果的影响。在安大略省和魁北克省,使用SQ HDM SLIT片剂进行3年治疗的直接治疗费用均高于HDM SCIT(4732.12美元和4829.03美元,3434.51美元和2987.74美元)。但是,当将间接成本添加到模型中时,使用SQ HDM SLIT片剂治疗的总节省额为:安大略省1833.00加元和魁北克省769.03加元。在所有分析的情况下,通过对HDM SCIT资源使用情况,折扣率,滴定和维护注射,护士时间以及每个小瓶的注射次数进行敏感性分析,与HDM SCIT相比,SQ HDM SLIT片剂节省了SQ HDM SLIT片剂。 CMA指出,从社会角度来看,在安大略省和魁北克省,SQ HDM SLIT片剂是HDM SCIT的成本最低的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号