首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Medical and Biological Research >The Immunomodulatory, Antimicrobial and Bactericidal Efficacy of Commonly Used Commercial Household Disinfectants, Sterilizers and Antiseptics in Vitro: Laboratory Assessment of Anti-Inflammatory Infection Control Mechanisms and Comparative Biochemical Analysis of the Microbial Growth of Gram-Negative Bacteria
【24h】

The Immunomodulatory, Antimicrobial and Bactericidal Efficacy of Commonly Used Commercial Household Disinfectants, Sterilizers and Antiseptics in Vitro: Laboratory Assessment of Anti-Inflammatory Infection Control Mechanisms and Comparative Biochemical Analysis of the Microbial Growth of Gram-Negative Bacteria

机译:常用的商用家用消毒剂,消毒剂和防腐剂的免疫调节,抗菌和杀菌功效:消炎感染控制机制的实验室评估和革兰氏阴性菌微生物生长的比较生化分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory and microbial infection control strategies characterize the spiral evolution of public awareness of health safety issues. This is substantiated with burgeoning number of cases of microbial contamination and/or infection in myriad healthcare settings, at the hospital, and even at home. Previously, we have investigated and identified laboratory parameters in the assessment of the antimicrobial effects of a myriad of commercial disinfectants on the growth of pathogenic and saprophytic gram-positive bacteria. The present sequel study investigates the antimicrobial/bactericidal effects of commercially available disinfectants, sterilizers, antiseptics, and chlorhexidine-containing detergents on the growth of saprophytic and pathogenic gram-negative bacteria in vitro. It is an unprecedented wide canopy enveloping standardized comparative assessments of the antimicrobial efficiency of consumer-targeted household detergents, curbing and containing microbial infection, inflammation and contamination propensity. Methods: Given the medical significance and impact of public infection control, we have meticulously examined at least 22 different detergents categorized into four classes (each category comprises a variety of commercially available products commonly used by the public): i) Class A – Daily Mouthwash; ii) Class B – Toilet Bowl Cleaners/Bleaches/Sanitizers; iii) Class C – Surface and Floor Mopping Cleaners/Detergents; and iv) Class D – Hand and Body Wash Gels. Whilst the canonical menu of active ingredients varies among those aforementioned classes, antimicrobial components are well established. Results: Regarding Class A, the most effective against Citrobacter koseri is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; Enterobacter cloacae is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; Escherichia coli is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; Escherichia coli ESBL is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; Klebsiella pneumoniae is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; Proteus vulgaris is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; Pseudomonas aeruginosa is ‘Perio.Kin Chlorhexidina 0.20 %’; Salmonella typhimurium is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’; and Shigella sonnei is ‘Colgate Plax Mouthwash’. Regarding Class B, the most effective against C. koseri is ‘Harpic Power Plus Disinfectant’; E. cloacae is ‘WC Net Bleach Gel’; E. coli is ‘WC Net Bleach Gel’; E. coli ESBL is ‘WC Net Bleach Gel’; K. pneumoniae are ‘WC Net Bleach Gel’ and ‘Harpic Power Plus Disinfectant’; P. vulgaris is ‘Spartan Max WC Lavender’; P. aeruginosa is ‘WC Net Bleach Gel’; S. typhimurium is ‘Clorox Bleach Rain Clean’; and S. sonnei is ‘Harpic Power Plus Disinfectant’. Regarding Class C, the most effective against C. koseri is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; E. cloacae is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; E. coli is ‘Vim Cream Multipurpose Fast Rinsing’; E. coli ESBL is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; K. pneumoniae is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; P. vulgaris is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; P. aeruginosa is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; S. typhimurium is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’; and S. sonnei is ‘Dettol Antiseptic/Disinfectant’. Regarding Class D, the most effective against C. koseri, E. cloacae, E. coli, E. coli ESBL, K. pneumoniae, P. vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, and S. sonnei is unprecedentedly the ‘HiGeen Hand and Body Wash Gel’.
机译:背景:免疫调节/抗炎和微生物感染控制策略的特点是公众对健康安全问题的意识呈螺旋式发展。在无数医疗机构,医院甚至家庭中,微生物污染和/或感染的病例数迅速增加,就证明了这一点。以前,我们在评估各种商业消毒剂对致病性和腐生革兰氏阳性细菌生长的抗微生物作用的评估中,已经调查并确定了实验室参数。本续集研究调查了商用消毒剂,消毒剂,防腐剂和含氯己定的清洁剂对腐生和致病性革兰氏阴性菌体外生长的抗菌/杀菌作用。它是针对消费者目标的家用清洁剂的抗菌功效,遏制并遏制微生物感染,炎症和污染倾向的前所未有的,广泛的,涵盖标准的比较评估标准。方法:鉴于公共感染控制的医学意义和影响,我们仔细检查了至少22种不同的清洁剂,这些清洁剂分为四类(每类包括各种公众常用的市售产品):i)A类–日常漱口水; ii)B类–马桶清洁剂/漂白剂/消毒剂; iii)C类–地面和地面拖把清洁剂/洗涤剂; iv)D类–洗手和沐浴露。尽管在上述类别中活性成分的规范菜单有所不同,但抗菌成分已得到很好的确立。结果:关于A类,最有效的抗科氏柠檬酸杆菌是“ Colgate Plax漱口水”;阴沟肠杆菌是“ Colgate Plax漱口水”;大肠杆菌是“高露洁普拉克斯漱口水”;大肠杆菌ESBL是“ Colgate Plax漱口水”;肺炎克雷伯菌是“高露洁Plax漱口水”;变形杆菌是“高露洁普拉克斯漱口水”;铜绿假单胞菌是“ Perio.Kin Chlorhexidina 0.20%”;鼠伤寒沙门氏菌是“高露洁普拉克斯漱口水”;而Shigella sonnei是“高露洁普拉克斯漱口水”。关于B级,最有效的抗C. koseri的是“ Harpic Power Plus消毒剂”; E. cloacae是“ WC Net Bleach Gel”;大肠杆菌是“ WC Net Bleach Gel”;大肠杆菌ESBL是“ WC Net Bleach Gel”;肺炎克雷伯菌是“ WC Net Bleach Gel”和“ Harpic Power Plus Disinfectant”; P. vulgaris是“ Spartan Max WC Lavender”;铜绿假单胞菌是“ WC Net Bleach Gel”;鼠伤寒沙门氏菌是“ Clorox Bleach Rain Clean”。 S. sonnei是“ Harpic Power Plus消毒剂”。对于C类,最有效的抗小肠念珠菌是“ Dettol杀菌剂/消毒剂”;阴沟肠杆菌是“滴露消毒剂/消毒剂”;大肠杆菌是“ Vim奶油多用途快速漂洗”;大肠杆菌ESBL是“滴露防腐剂/消毒剂”;肺炎克雷伯菌是“滴露防腐剂/消毒剂”; P. vulgaris是“滴露防腐剂/消毒剂”;铜绿假单胞菌是“滴露防腐剂/消毒剂”;鼠伤寒沙门氏菌是“滴露防腐剂/消毒剂”; S. sonnei是“滴露消毒剂/消毒剂”。关于D类,最有效的抗小肠念珠菌,阴沟肠杆菌,大肠杆菌,大肠杆菌ESBL,肺炎克雷伯菌,寻常型杆菌,铜绿假单胞菌,鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和索内链球菌最有效。手和沐浴露凝胶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号