首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Engineering Research >Comparison of Analytical Hierarchy Process And Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution Method To Determine Service Quality At Bank
【24h】

Comparison of Analytical Hierarchy Process And Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution Method To Determine Service Quality At Bank

机译:与确定银行服务质量的理想解法相似的订单偏好分析层次方法与技术比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Service is the main factor in a service company, good service is by paying attention to the needs and needs of the customer. In this study discusses customer satisfaction with services performed by banks. Where satisfaction is not only obtained from the results but also through the quality of services provided by the bank. This selection is based on several criteria applied. This study was conducted to study and compare multi-criteria (MCDM) decision-making methods in the selection of banks that have the best service quality. The method compared in this study is the AHP and TOPSIS methods. The criteria in this study include, focus, solution, accuracy, time, and clarity. The results of the research show that, the comparison of these two methods has different results. Based on the AHP and TOPSIS methods, the method that is more suitable for use in companies is the TOPSIS Method although it does not yet have a Consistent index. The results of the analysis are using the AHP method, the best quality of customer service is 0.153898043, while the results of the analysis with the TOPSIS method is 0.63318302.
机译:服务是服务公司的主要因素,良好的服务是通过关注客户的需求和需求。在这项研究中,讨论了客户对银行提供的服务的满意度。不仅可以从结果中获得满意,而且可以通过银行提供的服务质量来获得满意。该选择基于所应用的几个标准。本研究旨在研究和比较多标准(MCDM)决策方法,以选择具有最佳服务质量的银行。本研究中比较的方法是AHP和TOPSIS方法。这项研究的标准包括重点,解决方案,准确性,时间和清晰度。研究结果表明,两种方法的比较具有不同的结果。基于AHP和TOPSIS方法,尽管尚无一致的索引,但更适合公司使用的方法是TOPSIS方法。分析结果使用AHP方法,最佳客户服务质量为0.153898043,而使用TOPSIS方法分析的结果为0.63318302。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号