首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering >Comparison between the Vector Control Based on Anti-saturation Capability with the Sensorless Vector Control in PMSM
【24h】

Comparison between the Vector Control Based on Anti-saturation Capability with the Sensorless Vector Control in PMSM

机译:PMSM中基于抗饱和能力的矢量控制与无传感器矢量控制的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper investigates a comparison between the sensorless vector control method based on MRAS (Model Reference Adaptive System) using SVPWM (Space Vector Modulation) and the control method of the PMSM (Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor) Based on anti-saturation current controller. MRAS algorithm is based on comparison between the estimators. The error between the estimated quantities obtained by the two models is used to evaluate the rotor speed that started in order to create an optimum vector control method. This method is compared with vector control based on anti-saturation current control block. That created in order to reduce the ripple in vector control current. These two control method were simulated in MATLAB and after comparing the current THD(Total Harmonic Distortion) of the two methods, it was observed the vector control based on anti-saturation block with shaft encoder has bigger volume, less current ripple and more cost than sensorless method.
机译:本文研究了基于SVPWM(空间矢量调制)的基于MRAS(模型参考自适应系统)的无传感器矢量控制方法与基于反饱和电流控制器的PMSM(永磁同步电动机)的控制方法之间的比较。 MRAS算法基于估计量之间的比较。通过两个模型获得的估计量之间的误差用于评估启动的转子速度,以创建最佳矢量控制方法。将该方法与基于抗饱和电流控制模块的矢量控制进行了比较。这是为了减少矢量控制电流中的纹波而创建的。在MATLAB中对这两种控制方法进行了仿真,并比较了两种方法的当前总谐波失真,发现基于带轴编码器的抗饱和块矢量控制具有体积大,电流纹波小,成本高的特点。无传感器方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号