首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting between surgical patients received propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia: A matched study
【24h】

The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting between surgical patients received propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia: A matched study

机译:接受丙泊酚和七氟醚麻醉的手术患者术后恶心和呕吐的风险:一项配对研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: The current consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) suggest that one of anesthetic risk factors is the use of volatile anesthetics. However, in clinical settings, it is rare to perceive propofol to be superior to volatile anesthetics for the prevention of PONV. To assess whether PONV is related to the type of anesthetic delivered, we compared the incidence and duration of PONV between propofol anesthesia and sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of an institutional registry containing 21606 general anesthesia cases conducted following ethics board approval. Anesthesia for all patients was managed with propofol or sevoflurane. To avoid channeling bias, a propensity score analysis was used to generate a set of matched cases (propofol anesthesia) and controls (sevoflurane anesthesia), yielding 2554 matched patient pairs. The incidence and sustained rate of symptoms were compared as the primary outcomes. Results: In the unmatched population, a higher incidence of PONV occurred following propofol anesthesia compared to sevoflurane anesthesia (propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: 18.9% vs. 15.3%, respectively, p < 0.0001). The sustained rate of PONV over the course after propofol anesthesia was also higher than that following sevoflurane anesthesia (p < 0.001). Conversely, less PONV occurred after propofol compared to sevoflurane after propensity matching (propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: 20.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively, p = 0.01). However, the sustained rate of PONV over the course after propofol anesthesia did not differ from that following sevoflurane anesthesia (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Propofol could decrease the incidence of PONV compared with sevoflurane, although the duration of PONV was not affected as found in previous reports.
机译:目的:目前有关术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)的共识指南表明,麻醉药的危险因素之一是使用挥发性麻醉药。但是,在临床环境中,很少有人认为丙泊酚在预防PONV方面要优于挥发性麻醉药。为了评估PONV是否与所输送的麻醉剂类型相关,我们比较了异丙酚麻醉和七氟醚麻醉之间PONV的发生率和持续时间。方法:我们对伦理委员会批准后进行的包含21606例全身麻醉病例的机构注册进行了回顾性审查。所有患者的麻醉均采用异丙酚或七氟醚进行。为了避免通道偏差,使用倾向评分分析来生成一组匹配的病例(丙泊酚麻醉)和对照(七氟醚麻醉),产生2554个匹配的患者对。比较症状的发生率和持续发生率作为主要结局。结果:在无与伦比的人群中,与七氟醚麻醉相比,丙泊酚麻醉后PONV发生率更高(丙泊酚与七氟醚麻醉分别为18.9%和15.3%,p <0.0001)。异丙酚麻醉后整个过程中PONV的持续率也高于七氟醚麻醉后的持续率(p <0.001)。相反,倾向匹配后与七氟醚相比,丙泊酚后发生的PONV更少(丙泊酚与七氟醚麻醉:分别为20.4%和23.3%,p = 0.01)。但是,在异丙酚麻醉后的整个过程中,PONV的持续率与七氟醚麻醉后的持续率没有差异(p = 0.09)。结论:与七氟醚相比,丙泊酚可以降低PONV的发生,尽管PONV的持续时间不受先前报道的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号