...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: Comparison of epidural PCA and intravenous PCA
【24h】

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) following video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: Comparison of epidural PCA and intravenous PCA

机译:电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术后的患者自控镇痛(PCA):硬膜外PCA与静脉内PCA的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and side effects of epidural patient-controlled analgesia (EPCA) with those of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in fast-track video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy. Patients and methods: EPCA or IVPCA was chosen by patients and was started immediately following tracheal extubation in the wake of completion of VATS lobectomy. EPCA analgesia was carried out with the PCA device programmed to deliver a bolus dose of 3 mL of 0.1% bupivacaine combined with 1.2 @mg/mL fentanyl, and continuous epidural infusion at a rate of 4 mL/hour through an epidural catheter placed at the T"6"-"7 or T"7"-"8 level. IVPCA was made possible by a patient controlled infusion pump programmed to deliver 0.1% morphine with a loading dose of 3 mg, and the controlled bolus of 1 mg, at a lockout interval of 5 minutes. A rescue dose of 5 mg intravenous morphine was available for all patients in postoperative care unit. Pain management was assessed with visual analog scale at rest (VAS-R) and during motion (VAS-M); side effects including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, dizziness and sleepiness were recorded and analyzed from postoperative Day 1 (POD1) to Day 3 (POD3). Results: This study included 105 patients. Satisfactory pain control was achieved, although 9/70 patients in the EPCA group and 5/35 patients in the IVPCA group needed rescue morphine in the recovery room. The VAS-R was significantly higher on POD1 than on POD2 or POD3 in both groups (p < 0.001). The VAS-R and VAS-M were comparable in both groups on POD1 and POD3 but significant lower VAS-M was seen in the EPCA group on POD2 (p = 0.008). Higher incidence of dizziness was found in the IVPCA group on POD1 (p = 0.044) but the EPCA group had a higher incidence of pruritus on POD2 (p = 0.024) and POD3 (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Our results indicated that the necessity of pain control was higher on POD1 for VATS lobectomy. Both EPCA and IVPCA can provide an adequate, continuous and effective means for postoperative pain management and a lower VAS-M was found in EPCA on POD2.
机译:目的:比较硬膜外自控镇痛(EPCA)和静脉自控镇痛(IVPCA)在快速视频胸腔镜(VATS)肺叶切除术中的疗效和副作用。患者和方法:患者选择EPCA或IVPCA,在VATS肺叶切除术完成后气管拔管后立即开始使用。用PCA装置对EPCA进行镇痛,将PCA装置编程为通过推注剂量的3 mL 0.1%布比卡因与1.2 @ mg / mL芬太尼的快速浓注,并通过置于硬膜外的硬膜外导管以4 mL /小时的速度连续硬膜外输注。 T“ 6”-“ 7或T” 7“-” 8级。通过患者控制的输液泵使IVPCA成为可能,该输液泵被编程为以5分钟的锁定间隔以3 mg的负载剂量和1 mg的可控推注剂量输送0.1%吗啡。术后护理单位的所有患者均可获得5 mg静脉吗啡的抢救剂量。用静止时(VAS-R)和运动中(VAS-M)的视觉模拟量表评估疼痛管理;从术后第1天(POD1)到第3天(POD3)记录并分析副作用,包括恶心,呕吐,瘙痒,头晕和嗜睡。结果:这项研究包括105例患者。尽管在EPCA组中有9/70的患者和在IVPCA组中有5/35的患者需要在恢复室中抢救吗啡,但疼痛控制还是令人满意的。在两组中,POD1上的VAS-R均显着高于POD2或POD3(P <0.001)。在POD1和POD3上,两组的VAS-R和VAS-M相当,但在POD2上的EPCA组中,VAS-M明显降低(p = 0.008)。 IVPCA组在POD1上出现头晕的可能性较高(p = 0.044),而EPCA组在POD2(p = 0.024)和POD3上的瘙痒发生率较高(p = 0.03)。结论:我们的结果表明,对于VATS肺叶切除术,在POD1上控制疼痛的必要性更高。 EPCA和IVPCA均可为术后疼痛处理提供充分,连续和有效的方法,而POD2上EPCA中的VAS-M较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号