...
首页> 外文期刊>Computing and informatics >A Comparison of Decision Tree Classifiers for Automatic Diagnosis of Speech Recognition Errors
【24h】

A Comparison of Decision Tree Classifiers for Automatic Diagnosis of Speech Recognition Errors

机译:自动识别语音识别错误的决策树分类器的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Present speech recognition systems are becoming more complex due to technology advances, optimizations and special requirements such as small computation and memory footprints. Proper handling of system failures can be seen as a kind of fault diagnosis. Motivated by the success of decision tree diagnosis in other scientific fields and by their successful application in speech recognition in the last decade, we contribute to the topic mainly in terms of comparison of different types of decision trees. Five styles are examined: CART (testing three different splitting criteria), C4.5, and then Minimum Message Length (MML), strict MML and Bayesian styles decision trees. We apply these techniques to data of computer speech recognition fed by intrinsically variable speech. We conclude that for this task, CART technique outperforms C4.5 in terms of better classification for ASR failures.
机译:由于技术进步,优化和特殊要求(例如小计算量和内存占用量),当前的语音识别系统变得越来越复杂。正确处理系统故障可以看作是一种故障诊断。受其他科学领域中决策树诊断成功以及在过去十年中在语音识别中成功应用的推动,我们主要通过比较不同类型的决策树为该主题做出贡献。检查了五种样式:CART(测试三个不同的拆分标准),C4.5,然后是最小消息长度(MML),严格的MML和贝叶斯样式决策树。我们将这些技术应用于由内在可变语音提供的计算机语音识别数据。我们得出结论,就更好的ASR故障分类而言,CART技术优于C4.5。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号