...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Chemical Engineering >Comparative Economic Investigation Options for Liquefied Petroleum Gas Production from Natural Gas Liquids
【24h】

Comparative Economic Investigation Options for Liquefied Petroleum Gas Production from Natural Gas Liquids

机译:从天然气液体生产液化石油气的比较经济研究选择

获取原文
           

摘要

There is new trend in the value of oil and gas in the world, with the value of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) soaring higher. It is due to its uses as a potential fuel in the several parts of the world, its demand in the petrochemical industries for plastics and automotive composites productions, and other uses. These results in steadily increases in price. There is also increase in volume of feed gas, which demands efficient LPG processing and recovery technology. This paper mainly focuses on comparative economic investigation options for Liquefied Petroleum Gas plant, which processes feed from natural gas wells and dehydrating units to produce Liquefied Petroleum Gas along with natural gasoline having a higher value as separate product. Recovery of LPG is possible but raises both the initial cost of plant and operational cost considerably. The value of LPG recovered should be high enough to widen the operating margins between the processing costs and the market price for which the recovered liquids can be sold. Therefore, the most economic means of extracting this product must be used. This was done using two alternatives; the Conventional Fractionation process and Single column overhead recycle process (SCORE). Both alternatives were simulated with Hysys and are analyzed based on product recovery level, energy required and fixed capital cost. There are two feeds to the plant, one from the natural gas wells and the other from dehydrating units of natural gas processing plants with a total flow rate of 6.99 MMSCFD. Analysis of result from modeling shows that Single column overhead recycle process has a total product recovery of 97.2 % while Conventional fractionation process has a total recovery of 88.5 %, the require energy margin between the alternatives is about 38.9 % in favor of conventional process and the fixed capital cost is in the favor of Single column process. Sensitive to choosing the most economic option of LPG recovery between the conventional process and SCORE process is the recovery level of LPG from each of the options, total energy required and the cost of the equipment. From the analysis, it shows that, it is more economical to use the Single column overhead recycle process, as compared to conventional fractionation process.
机译:随着液化石油气(LPG)的价格飙升,世界上石油和天然气的价格出现了新的趋势。它是由于其在世界各地用作潜在燃料,石化行业对塑料和汽车复合材料产品的需求以及其他用途而产生的。这些导致价格稳定上升。进料气的体积也增加,这需要有效的LPG处理和回收技术。本文主要关注液化石油气工厂的比较经济研究选择,该工厂处理天然气井和脱水装置的进料,以生产液化石油气以及具有较高价值的天然汽油作为单独产品。回收液化石油气是可能的,但会大大增加工厂的初始成本和运营成本。回收的液化石油气的价值应足够高,以扩大加工成本和可以出售回收液的市场价格之间的营业利润率。因此,必须使用提取该产品的最经济的方法。这是使用两种替代方法完成的;常规分馏工艺和单塔塔顶回收工艺(SCORE)。两种方案都使用Hysys进行了仿真,并根据产品回收率,所需能源和固定资本成本进行了分析。有两种进料,一种来自天然气井,另一种来自天然气加工厂的脱水装置,总流量为6.99 MMSCFD。建模结果分析表明,单塔塔顶循环工艺的总回收率为97.2%,而常规分馏工艺的总回收率为88.5%,替代方法之间的需求能量裕度约为38.9%,这有利于常规工艺和固定资本成本有利于单塔工艺。在传统工艺和SCORE工艺之间选择最经济的LPG回收方案的敏感之处在于,每种方案的LPG回收水平,所需的总能量和设备成本。从分析中可以看出,与传统的分馏工艺相比,使用单塔塔顶循环工艺更经济。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号