...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical medicine & research. >CB1-02: A Comparison of Blood Pressure Measurements Derived from Primary Care Practice and Research Settings
【24h】

CB1-02: A Comparison of Blood Pressure Measurements Derived from Primary Care Practice and Research Settings

机译:CB1-02:比较来自基层医疗实践和研究设置的血压测量结果

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/AimsGuidelines for blood pressure (BP) treatment thresholds and goals have been derived from measurements obtained in research clinics (RC), but few studies have compared BP measurements obtained in RC and routine primary care practice (PCP) settings, where decisions about BP treatment occur. AimsTo compare BP obtained from RC and PCP settings using data from Hyperlink, a randomized controlled trial of home BP telemonitoring. MethodsEligible subjects included 1,138 subjects whose 2 most recent PCP BP in the last 12 months were >140/90, responded with interest to a mailed invitation, and attended a research clinic (RC) screening visit for the Hyperlink study. Of these subjects, 255 had an additional PCP BP measurement within 30 days before the RC visit and were included in this analysis. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) used for RC was the mean of 3 readings obtained using an automated blood pressure device, and for PCP was the single measurement (with sphygmomanometer as usual procedure) recorded in the electronic medical record closest to the RC visit. ResultsThe SBP mean (SD) in mm Hg for PCP was 136.9 (15.8) and for RC was 133.5 (17.6), a mean within-person difference of 3.3, p=.005. DBP mean (SD) for PCP was 77.9 (11.1) and for RC was 75.9 (12.2), difference of -2.0, p=.005. Correlation coefficients between PCP and RC readings were 0.38 for SBP and 0.55 for DBP. Of 103 subjects with PCP SBP >=140, 52 (50%) had RC SBP 150, +17 mm Hg; PCP SBP 140-149, +8 mm Hg; PCP SBP 130-139, +0.3 mm Hg; PCP SBP <130, -6 mm Hg). DiscussionBP obtained in the RC setting was significantly lower than BP obtained in the PCP setting; only half of patients with uncontrolled PCP BP were confirmed in the RC. The differences could result in poorer outcomes on PCP BP performance measures and over-treatment of BP. The results support the use of better methods to more accurately assess and manage BP in the PCP setting.
机译:背景/目标血压(BP)治疗阈值和目标的指南是从研究诊所(RC)获得的测量结果中得出的,但是很少有研究将RC和常规初级保健实践(PCP)设置中获得的BP测量结果进行比较治疗发生。目的为了比较使用超链接的数据从RC和PCP设置获得的BP,Hyperlink是家庭BP远程监控的随机对照试验。方法符合条件的受试者包括1138名受试者,在过去12个月中,有2名最近的PCP BP> 140/90,对邮寄的邀请感兴趣,并参加了研究诊所(RC)的筛选访问以进行Hyperlink研究。在这些受试者中,有255名在RC访视前30天内进行了另外的PCP BP测量,并纳入了该分析。用于RC的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)是使用自动血压仪获得的三个读数的平均值,而用于PCP的是电子医疗中记录的单次测量(使用血压计作为常规程序)记录最接近RC访问。结果PCP的SBP平均值(SD)以mm Hg为单位为136.9(15.8),RC的SBP平均值为133.5(17.6),人与人之间的平均差异为3.3,p = .005。 PCP的DBP平均值(SD)为77.9(11.1),RC的DBP平均值为75.9(12.2),差异为-2.0,p = .005。 PCP和RC读数之间的相关系数对于SBP为0.38,对于DBP为0.55。在103名PCP SBP> = 140的受试者中,有52名(50%)的RC SBP 150,+ 17毫米汞柱; PCP SBP 140-149,+ 8毫米汞柱; PCP SBP 130-139,+ 0.3毫米汞柱; PCP SBP <130,-6 mm Hg)。讨论在RC设置中获得的BP显着低于在PCP设置中获得的BP。 PC BP失控的患者中只有一半在RC中得到确认。差异可能会导致PCP BP绩效指标的不良结果和BP的过度治疗。结果支持在PCP设置中使用更好的方法来更准确地评估和管理BP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号