首页> 外文期刊>Clinical medicine & research. >PS2-20: Identifying Treatment Resistant Depression in Administrative Claims Databases
【24h】

PS2-20: Identifying Treatment Resistant Depression in Administrative Claims Databases

机译:PS2-20:在行政理赔数据库中识别抗抑郁药

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background/AimsOver 50% of depressed patients fail to remit after an adequate antidepressant (AD) treatment course, and 35% remain symptomatic after two adequate treatment courses. Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have higher risks of morbidity and mortality, and substantially higher healthcare expenditures. This study aims to develop and validate algorithms to identify patients with TRD in claims databases. MethodsWe first identified Harvard Pilgrim Health Care members aged 18 years or older who had a diagnosis of depression and new use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin- norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (after at least 365 days of no AD use) in 2000-2009. Among these patients, we identified those who received adequate treatment, defined as treatment initiated at or greater than the recommended starting dose based on practice guidelines and taken for at least 8 weeks. We will further identify patients with TRD, i.e., patients who are treated adequately but fail to remit. Although multiple definitions for TRD exist in the guidelines and literature, we will use the emerging consensus of failure to remit after two adequate treatment courses as our definition of TRD. We will consider various markers of treatment resistance such as switching ADs (particularly to those reserved for second-line), adding atypical antipsychotics or other non-AD medications commonly used for depression, and invasive nonpharmacologic intervention. We will validate our algorithms via chart review. ResultsIn preliminary results, 114,002 patients meeting inclusion criteria initiated an AD and 63,882 (56.0%) completed an adequate treatment course. Among these patients, 35,547 (55.6%) continued that treatment, 10,255 (16.1%) stopped treatment, and 5,753 (9.0%) switched to another AD. Among switchers, 3,625 (63.0%) achieved adequate treatment with the second AD. After examining treatment patterns and markers of treatment resistance, we will select the most promising algorithm and validate 300 randomly selected potential cases identified by the algorithm beginning in December. DiscussionClaims databases have potential to identify TRD, but algorithms to identify such patients must be developed. Once such an algorithm is validated, these databases can be assessed to answer important questions about the safety and effectiveness of treatments for TRD patients. Primary: Mental Health
机译:背景/目的超过50%的抑郁症患者在接受足够的抗抑郁药(AD)治疗过程后未能缓解症状,而35%的患者在两次适当的治疗过程后仍保持症状。患有抗药性抑郁症(TRD)的患者有更高的发病率和死亡率风险,并且医疗保健支出也高得多。本研究旨在开发和验证在索赔数据库中识别TRD患者的算法。方法我们首先在2000-2009年确定了18岁或18岁以上的哈佛朝圣者医疗保健人员,他们被诊断出患有抑郁症并选择性使用了血清素再摄取抑制剂或血清素去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(至少365天未使用AD)。在这些患者中,我们确定了接受适当治疗的患者,治疗定义为根据实践指南以等于或大于建议的起始剂量开始的治疗,并且服用了至少8周。我们将进一步确定患有TRD的患者,即经过适当治疗但无法缓解的患者。尽管指南和文献中对TRD有多种定义,但我们将使用经过两次适当的治疗后未能汇出的新兴共识作为我们对TRD的定义。我们将考虑各种治疗抗药性指标,例如转换AD(尤其是用于二线药物),添加非典型抗精神病药或其他通常用于抑郁症的非AD药物以及有创性非药物干预。我们将通过图表审查来验证算法。结果在初步结果中,有114,002名符合纳入标准的患者发起了AD,并且63,882名(56.0%)完成了适当的治疗过程。在这些患者中,有35,547例(55.6%)继续接受治疗,有10,255例(16.1%)停止了治疗,还有5,753例(9.0%)改用另一位AD。在第二个AD中,有3,625个(63.0%)的切换者获得了足够的治疗。在检查了治疗模式和治疗耐药性标记后,我们将选择最有前途的算法,并从12月开始验证300随机选择的潜在病例,该病例由该算法确定。 DiscussionClaims数据库具有识别TRD的潜力,但是必须开发识别此类患者的算法。一旦验证了这种算法,就可以评估这些数据库,以回答有关TRD患者治疗安全性和有效性的重要问题。小学:心理健康

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号