首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Physics Theories and Applications >Dark Energy, Super Yang Mills Theory, Schr?dinger’s Equations And Black Scholes Theory
【24h】

Dark Energy, Super Yang Mills Theory, Schr?dinger’s Equations And Black Scholes Theory

机译:暗能量,超级杨米尔斯理论,薛定er方程和布莱克·斯科尔斯理论

获取原文
           

摘要

Although the powers of understanding of human senses and the scope of Newtonian science are limited to three spatial dimensions, the scope of our universe is not limited to three dimensions. In fact, news theories hypothesize there are eleven dimensions. Many of the natural phenomena happening within our universe transcend the three dimension scene. Therefore, it is not possible to assume that the mechanisms of operation of the brain and consciousness remain imprisoned within the confines of Isaac Newton’s three dimensional material universes. Just as the Earth was proved not to be the center of the universe, our current theories that govern our physical universe such as Einstein’s gravity theory and others may become obsolete in our understanding of reality. An Idea or multiplicity is really a process of progressive determination of differential elements, differential relations, and singularities. Let us take these step-by-step. “Elements” must have no independent existence from the system in which they inhere; phonemes as the elements of the virtual linguistic Idea are an example Deleuze uses in Difference and Repetition. When phonemes are actualized they enter into differential relations that determine the patterns of individual languages; thus the English phoneme /p/ is reciprocally determined by its differences from /t/, /b/, /d/, and so on. Finally, these differential relations of an individual language determine singularities or remarkable points at which the pattern of that language can shift: the Great Vowel Shift of Middle English being an example, or more prosaically, dialect pronunciation shifts. Propositions, in other words, can be related either to the objects, to which they refer, or to the subjects who utter them, or to other propositions. But each of these relations, in turn, can be taken to be primary. (1) In the domain of speech, it is the “I” that begins: manifestation not only makes denotation possible (Hume), but is also prior to signification (Descartes' cogito). (2) In the domain of language, however, it is signification that is primary, since one is always born into a preexisting language, and signified concepts are always primary in relation to the self as a manifested person or to things as designated objects. (3) Yet in the domain of logic we see the primacy of designation: as shown by the hypothetical mode of implications, the logical value of demonstration is not the truth, but rather the conditions of truth (the conditions of possibility under which the proposition would be true); the premises must thus be posited as effectively true, which forces one to leave the pure order of implication in order to relate the premises to a denoted state of affairs. Logical designation, in other words, cannot fulfill its putative role as foundation, since it presupposes an irreducible denotation. The theory of the proposition is thus caught in a circle, with each condition in turn being conditioned by what it supposedly conditions. “For the condition of truth to avoid this defect,” Deleuze argues, “it would have to have something unconditioned capable of assuring a real genesis of designation and the other dimensions of the proposition: the condition of truth would then be defined, no longer as the form of conceptual possibility, but as an ideal matter or ‘medium’ [matière ou ‘couche’ idéelle], that is, no longer as signification, but as sense” (LS 19).www.iiste.org/PDFshare/APTA-PAGENO-76271-80371.pdf.
机译:尽管理解人类感官的力量和牛顿科学的范围仅限于三个空间维度,但我们宇宙的范围并不限于三个维度。实际上,新闻理论假设有11个维度。我们宇宙中发生的许多自然现象都超越了三维场景。因此,不可能假设大脑和意识的运作机制仍然被囚禁在艾萨克·牛顿的三维物质宇宙的范围内。正如事实证明地球不是宇宙的中心一样,爱丁斯坦的引力理论和其他诸如爱因斯坦的引力理论等控制物理宇宙的现有理论可能在我们对现实的理解中已过时。一个想法或多重性实际上是逐步确定微分元素,微分关系和奇点的过程。让我们逐步进行这些操作。 “元素”必须没有独立于其所在系统的独立存在;作为虚拟语言思想要素的音素是德勒兹在差异和重复中使用的一个例子。当音素被实现时,它们会进入微分关系,从而确定各个语言的模式。因此,英语音素/ p /由与/ t /,/ b /,/ d /等的区别来反过来确定。最后,单个语言的这些不同关系决定了该语言的模式可以转变的奇异点或显着点:例如,中古英语的元音大转变是一个例子,或者更普遍地说是方言发音的转变。换句话说,命题既可以与它们所指的对象相关,也可以与说出它们的主题或其他命题相关。但是,这些关系中的每一个都可以被视为主要关系。 (1)在言语领域中,开始的是“我”:表现不仅使可能成为可能(休)),而且还早于意义(Descartes的构想)。 (2)然而,在语言领域中,意义是最主要的,因为一个人总是生于一种既存的语言中,而所象征的概念对于作为被显现的人的自我或作为指定对象的事物而言始终是首要的。 (3)然而,在逻辑领域,我们看到了指定的首要性:如暗示的暗示模式所示,论证的逻辑价值不是真理,而是真理的条件(命题的可能性条件)会是真的);因此,前提必须被假定为有效真实,这迫使人们离开纯粹的暗示顺序,以便使前提与所表示的事务状态相关联。换句话说,逻辑名称不能履行其假定的基础作用,因为它以不可简化的表示为前提。因此,命题理论陷入了一个圆圈,每个条件又受其假定条件的限制。德勒兹认为:“为了避免这种缺陷的真实条件,就必须具有某种无条件的能力,以确保真正的名称指定和命题的其他方面:真实条件将被定义,而不再作为概念可能性的形式,但作为理想的事物或“媒介”,即不再是指称,而是意义。”(LS 19).www.iiste.org / PDFshare / APTA-PAGENO-76271-80371.pdf。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利