首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology >Comparison of community managed projects and conventional approaches in rural water supply of Ethiopia
【24h】

Comparison of community managed projects and conventional approaches in rural water supply of Ethiopia

机译:埃塞俄比亚农村供水社区管理项目与传统方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This study aimed to compare Community Managed Projects (CMP) approach with the conventional approaches (Non-CMP) in the case of Ethiopia. The data collection methods include a household survey (n=1806), community representative interviews (n=49), focus group discussions with district water experts (n=48) and observations of water systems (n=49). The data were collected from seven districts of two regions of Ethiopia. The study shows that CMP have a better platform to involve the community than non-CMP. In terms of reducing distances to water points, all approaches succeeded. However, the intended amount of water supplied is not achieved in all the cases: only 25% of CMP users and 18% of non-CMP users are able to get water according to the national standard, 15 L per capita per day. Fee collection in the approaches has a high disparity in favour of CMP. To keep long-lasting services, three requirements need to be particularly fulfilled: quantity, quality and accessibility.
机译:本研究旨在将埃塞俄比亚的社区管理项目(CMP)方法与常规方法(Non-CMP)进行比较。数据收集方法包括家庭调查(n = 1806),社区代表访谈(n = 49),与地区水专家的焦点小组讨论(n = 48)和水系统观测(n = 49)。数据是从埃塞俄比亚两个地区的七个地区收集的。研究表明,与非CMP相比,CMP具有更好的社区参与平台。在减少到水位的距离方面,所有方法都成功了。但是,并非在所有情况下都达到了预期的供水量:只有25%的CMP用户和18%的非CMP用户能够按照国家标准(人均每天15升)取水。这些方法中的费用收取在支持CMP方面存在很大差异。为了保持长期服务,需要特别满足三个要求:数量,质量和可访问性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号