...
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Ejournal >Performance Study of Manual Reaper Compared to Manual Harvesting for Rice and Wheat
【24h】

Performance Study of Manual Reaper Compared to Manual Harvesting for Rice and Wheat

机译:稻麦手工收割机与人工收割相比的性能研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This research work was carried out to compare the performance of manual reaper against manual harvesting method for rice and wheat. The average field capacity of manual reaper was 0.3482 ha/day for rice and 0.3236 ha/day for wheat with fuel consumption of 0.755 lit petrol/hr and 0.625 lit petrol/hr respectively. In manual harvesting, the average field capacity was 0.0312 ha/man-day and 0.0452 ha/man-day for rice and wheat respectively. It was revealed that using manual reaper, harvesting cost could be saved 58% for rice and 53% for wheat, consequently harvesting of selected crops by reaper was efficient than manual harvesting. It was also observed that if manual reaper works below break-even point 0.32 ha and 0.52 ha for rice and wheat respectively, it would not be economically feasible to farmers. Finally, manual reaper could be suggested as better mechanization for harvesting of rice and wheat, cultivated on fragmented lands.
机译:进行了这项研究工作,以比较手工收割机与手工收割水稻和小麦的性能。水稻的手动收割机的平均田间生产能力为0.3482公顷/天,小麦的平均田间处理能力为0.3236公顷/天,燃料消耗分别为0.755升汽油/小时和0.625升汽油/小时。在人工收割中,水稻和小麦的平均田间生产能力分别为0.0312公顷/人日和0.0452公顷/人日。结果表明,使用手动收割机,水稻可节省58%的收成成本,而小麦可节省53%,因此,用收割机收割某些农作物要比手动收割更有效。还观察到,如果水稻和小麦的手动收割机分别在收支平衡点0.32公顷和0.52公顷以下工作,对农民而言在经济上将不可行。最后,可以建议使用手动收割机,因为它是在零散的土地上种植水稻和小麦的更好机械化收割方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号