首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >Is economic institutional adaptation feasible for agri-environmental policy? Case of Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition standards
【24h】

Is economic institutional adaptation feasible for agri-environmental policy? Case of Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition standards

机译:对农业环境政策进行经济制度适应是否可行?良好农业和环境条件标准案例

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This review focuses on Czech implementation of standards for soil and water protection called Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAEC), with linkage to the European Union (EU) level. I investigate different elements of adaptive institutional economics: (i) summarise current knowledge regarding the social reasons for introducing GAEC; (ii) assess the evidence linked to GAEC to better understand the potential as well as boundaries of formalizing cause-effect links; (iii) clarify the pertinence of producers’ claims on costs accruing from GAEC implementation. These three points highlight the thesis of this paper: implementation in farmers’ practices of the theoretical concept of sustainability in terms of bridging together economics, society and the environment. The economic reasoning for GAEC introduction within adaptive institutional economics stems from the relational positioning of the knowledge of the costs of the impact of agricultural land use on other characteristic rural land uses. GAEC are needed, albeit the size of support obtained by producers surpasses the costs of complying; therefore, the result pays off for farms. We have learned that GAEC implementation is important from regional to EU levels and that its role is more related to economic institutional adaptation than to regulation. Adaptation of institutional economics is therefore feasible, making it possible to understand GAEC as a network which manages and enables knowledge transfer linked directly to regulation. Institutional economics can link sustainability with farmers’ practices and accounts for the behaviour of the farmers. In this review, I find that, for society, it is necessary to require measurement of agri-environmental outcomes for water resources, soil and biodiversity through GAEC at appropriate scales. These scales are likely to be relevant to adaptive institutional economy localities perceived by the rural public.
机译:这次审查的重点是捷克实施称为良好农业和环境条件(GAEC)的水土保持标准,并与欧盟(EU)级别挂钩。我研究了适应性制度经济学的不同要素:(i)总结有关引入GAEC的社会原因的最新知识; (ii)评估与GAEC相关的证据,以便更好地理解因果关系正式化的潜力和边界; (iii)阐明生产商就GAEC实施产生的费用提出索赔的针对性。这三点突出了本文的论点:在农民实践中贯彻经济,社会和环境之间的可持续性理论概念。在适应性制度经济学中引入GAEC的经济推理源于对农业土地利用的影响成本对其他农村特征土地利用的成本知识的相关定位。尽管生产者获得的支持超过了合规成本,但仍需要GAEC。因此,结果为农场带来了回报。我们了解到,GAEC的实施从区域到欧盟各级都很重要,其作用更多地与经济体制适应相关,而与法规无关。因此,对制度经济学进行调整是可行的,从而有可能将GAEC理解为管理和实现直接与法规相关的知识转移的网络。制度经济学可以将可持续性与农民的实践联系起来,并解释农民的行为。在这篇评论中,我发现,对于社会而言,有必要要求通过GAEC在适当规模上对水资源,土壤和生物多样性的农业环境成果进行衡量。这些量表可能与农村公众所认为的适应性机构经济场所有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号