首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural and Food Science >A review of risk prioritisation schemes of pathogens, pests and weeds: principles and practices
【24h】

A review of risk prioritisation schemes of pathogens, pests and weeds: principles and practices

机译:病原体,病虫害和杂草风险优先方案的审查:原则和实践

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Society?’s resources are scarce, and biosecurity actions need to be targeted and prioritised. Various models have been developed that prioritise and rank pests and diseases according to the risks they represent. A prioritisation model allows utilisation of scientific, ecological and economic information in decision-making related to biological hazards. This study discusses such models and the properties associated with them based on a review of 78 prioritisation studies. The scope of the models includes all aspects of biosecurity (human, animal and plant diseases, and invasive alien species), but with an emphasis on plant health. The geographical locations of the studies are primarily North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Half of the studies were conducted during the past five years. The review finds that there generally seems to be several prioritisation models, especially in the case of invasive plants, but only a select few models are used extensively. Impacts are often accounted for in the model, but the extent and economic sophistication of their inclusion varies. Treatment of uncertainty and feasibility of control was lacking from many studies.;
机译:社会的资源稀缺,需要针对生物安全行动并确定其优先次序。已经开发了各种模型,可以根据病虫害所代表的风险对它们进行优先排序。优先排序模型允许在与生物危害有关的决策中利用科学,生态和经济信息。这项研究基于对78个优先级研究的回顾,讨论了此类模型及其相关属性。模型的范围包括生物安全的所有方面(人类,动植物疾病和外来入侵物种),但重点是植物健康。研究的地理位置主要是北美,欧洲,澳大利亚和新西兰。一半的研究是在过去五年中进行的。审查发现,通常似乎有几种优先排序模型,尤其是在入侵植物的情况下,但是只有少数几种模型被广泛使用。在模型中通常会考虑影响,但影响的范围和经济复杂程度却有所不同。许多研究缺乏对不确定性和控制可行性的处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号