首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Economics >Developing countries – trends, differentiation
【24h】

Developing countries – trends, differentiation

机译:发展中国家–趋势,差异化

获取原文
           

摘要

Socio-economic backwardness is usually defined by common characteristics or classification. The differences between the DMEs and DCs in the case of resources (prevalence of DCs) and in the case of outputs and performance (prevalence of DMEs) is evident. The difference in the economic level and the level of living between the DCs and DMEs had deepened during the last three decades, however, it has to be pointed out again, that this difference is increasing still more slowly what can be a presage of an approaching turn (in the sense of the possible beginning of a slow decrease of this gap). While the per capita GDP indicator is regarded as one of the most important indicators of the economic level, the HDI can be regarded as the most important indicator of the given country population level of living and as such, it is hitherto rather underestimated. Similarly, the CPM indicator (as the measure of poverty), which is a composed indicator, has a higher testifying ability than a simple income level per capita in USD defined as the poverty level. It is obvious, that economic development is impossible without social development, and vice versa. Generally, the gap between the more developed developing countries, measured through the world income distribution, is then still widening. As a positive phenomenon, there can be, however, regarded the fact that deepening of this gap occurs at a lower rate. Through a more detailed analysis by the individual indicators, the most valuable from which are the indicators composed from several partial indicators (for example HDI, CPM), a certain tendencies towards the gradual improvement of the socio-economic situation in developing countries as a whole – but with the relevant differences in the individual regions of the world – can be discerned. In general, close ties have been proven between the economic growth and the growth of the population level of living, their mutual influencing and the main elements from which they are composed.
机译:社会经济落后通常由共同特征或分类来定义。 DME和DC之间在资源(DC的流行)以及产出和性能(DME的流行)之间的差异是显而易见的。 DC和DME之间的经济水平和生活水平之间的差异在最近的三十年中已经加深,但是,必须再次指出,这种差异正在以越来越缓慢的速度增长,这可能是即将到来的转弯(从这个差距可能开始缓慢减小的意义上来说)。人均国内生产总值指标被认为是经济水平上最重要的指标之一,而人类发展指数却可以被看作是给定国家人口生活水平的最重要指标,因此,迄今为止,它被低估了。同样,作为组成指标的CPM指标(作为贫困程度的指标)比简单的人均收入水平定义为贫困水平具有更高的证明能力。显而易见,没有社会发展就不可能实现经济发展,反之亦然。通常,通过世界收入分配来衡量,较发达的发展中国家之间的差距仍在扩大。但是,作为一种积极现象,可以认为这一差距的加深发生率较低。通过对各个指标进行更详细的分析,其中最有价值的是由几个部分指标(例如人类发展指数,植检委)组成的指标,在​​一定程度上倾向于逐步改善整个发展中国家的社会经济状况–但可以看出世界各个地区存在相关差异。总的来说,经济增长与人口生活水平的增长,相互影响以及构成人口的主要因素之间已证明存在密切联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号