首页> 外文期刊>Current zoology >Wild dogma: An examination of recent “evidence” for dingo regulation of invasive mesopredator release in Australia
【24h】

Wild dogma: An examination of recent “evidence” for dingo regulation of invasive mesopredator release in Australia

机译:野性教条:对澳大利亚侵入性中坚肌释放的丁戈调节的最新“证据”的检查

获取原文
       

摘要

There is growing interest in the role that apex predators play in shaping terrestrial ecosystems and maintaining trophic cascades. In line with the mesopredator release hypothesis, Australian dingoes ( Canis lupus dingo and hybrids) are assumed by many to regulate the abundance of invasive mesopredators, such as red foxes Vulpes vulpes and feral cats Felis catus , thereby providing indirect benefits to various threatened vertebrates. Several recent papers have claimed to provide evidence for the biodiversity benefits of dingoes in this way. Nevertheless, in this paper we highlight several critical weaknesses in the methodological approaches used in many of these reports, including lack of consideration for seasonal and habitat differences in activity, the complication of simple track-based indices by incorporating difficult-to-meet assumptions, and a reduction in sensitivity for assessing populations by using binary measures rather than potentially continuous measures. Of the 20 studies reviewed, 15 of them (75%) contained serious methodological flaws, which may partly explain the inconclusive nature of the literature investigating interactions between invasive Australian predators. We therefore assert that most of the “growing body of evidence” for mesopredator release is merely an inconclusive growing body of literature only. We encourage those interested in studying the ecological roles of dingoes relative to invasive mesopredators and native prey species to account for the factors we identify, and caution the value of studies that have not done so [ Current Zoology 57 (5): 568–583, 2011].
机译:人们对尖锐掠食者在塑造陆地生态系统和维持营养级联中的作用越来越感兴趣。根据中子释放者的假说,许多人都认为澳大利亚的野狗(Canis lupus dingo和杂种)会调节侵入性中子的数量,例如狐狸狐狸和野猫Felis catus,从而为各种濒危脊椎动物提供间接利益。最近的几篇论文声称以这种方式为野狗的生物多样性益处提供了证据。尽管如此,在本文中,我们还是着重指出了许多此类报告所使用的方法学上的几个关键弱点,包括缺乏对活动活动的季节性和栖息地差异的考虑,通过结合难以满足的假设而简化了基于跟踪的指数,通过使用二元测量而不是潜在的连续测量来降低评估人群的敏感性。在所审查的20项研究中,其中15项(占75%)存在严重的方法学缺陷,这可能部分解释了研究澳大利亚侵入性掠食者之间相互作用的文献的不确定性。因此,我们断言,中指释放的大多数“证据的增长”仅仅是一个不确定的文学增长而已。我们鼓励那些有兴趣研究野狗相对于侵入性中捕器和本地猎物物种的生态作用的人们考虑到我们确定的因素,并提醒尚未进行研究的价值[Current Zoology 57(5):568-583, 2011]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号