...
首页> 外文期刊>African Evaluation Journal >Contribution analysis as an evaluation strategy in the context of a sector-wide approach: Performance-based health financing in Rwanda
【24h】

Contribution analysis as an evaluation strategy in the context of a sector-wide approach: Performance-based health financing in Rwanda

机译:在全行业范围内将贡献分析作为一种评估战略:卢旺达基于绩效的卫生筹资

获取原文

摘要

Sector-wide approaches (SWAps) emerged as a response to donor fragmentation and non-adjusted and parallel programming. In the health sector, SWAps have received considerable support by the international donor community due to their potential to reduce inefficiencies through alignment to common procedures and hence to increase development effectiveness. Evaluating development cooperation in the context of a SWAp, however, translates into methodological challenges for evaluators who have to disentangle the cumulative effects in strongly donor-aligned, complex sector environments. In this article the authors discussed the application of a methodological strategy for evaluating development interventions in complex settings – for example in the context of a SWAp –and reflected the suitability of the approach. The authors conducted a contribution analysis, a theory-based approach to evaluation, and exemplified the approach for an intervention of performance-based financing for Rwandan health workers supported by the Rwanda-German cooperation. The findings suggested that the Rwandan system of performance based financing increased service orientation and outputs of health professionals, but also indicated that negative motivational side effects and resource constraints are real. With regard to the methodological approach, the authors conclude that contribution analysis has a high potential to evaluate development cooperation in the context of a SWAp dueto its high flexibility to use different data collection tools and its capability to assess risks and rival explanations. Challenges can be identified with regard to the efficiency of the evaluation strategy and a remaining trade-off between scope and causal strength ofevidence.
机译:部门范围的方法(SWAps)应运而生,以应对捐助者的支离破碎和未经调整的并行计划。在卫生部门,全部门办法因其有可能通过遵循共同程序减少低效率并因此提高发展效率而得到国际捐助界的大力支持。但是,在全部门办法范围内评价发展合作对评价者来说是方法上的挑战,他们必须弄清在与捐助者密切相关的复杂部门环境中的累积影响。在本文中,作者讨论了一种方法策略在复杂环境中(例如在SWAp的背景下)评估发展干预措施的应用,并反映了该方法的适用性。作者进行了贡献分析,一种基于理论的评估方法,并举例说明了在卢旺达-德国合作的支持下对卢旺达卫生工作者进行基于绩效的筹资干预的方法。研究结果表明,卢旺达基于绩效的筹资制度增加了卫生专业人员的服务导向和产出,但同时也表明负面的动机副作用和资源限制是真实的。关于方法论方法,作者认为,贡献分析在SWAp的背景下具有很高的潜力来评估发展合作,这是因为它具有使用不同数据收集工具的高度灵活性以及评估风险和竞争对手解释的能力。可以在评估策略的效率以及证据的范围和因果强度之间的剩余权衡方面确定挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号