首页> 外文期刊>Addictive Behaviors Reports >Disparities in retail marketing for little cigars and cigarillos in Los Angeles, California
【24h】

Disparities in retail marketing for little cigars and cigarillos in Los Angeles, California

机译:加利福尼亚洛杉矶的小雪茄和小雪茄的零售营销差异

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionEvidence of a concentration of cigarette advertising in predominantly low-income, non-White neighborhoods underscores the need to examine retail marketing and promotions for novel tobacco products like little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs). We sought to investigate neighborhood racial/ethnic disparities in LCC marketing at retail, including availability, advertising, price promotions, and product placement in Los Angeles, California.MethodsBetween January 2016 and April 2017, community health workers (n?=?19) conducted in-person observational audits from tobacco retail stores (n?=?679) located in zip codes with a high percentage of non-Hispanic White (n?=?196), Black (n?=?194), Hispanic/Latino (n?=?189), or Korean American (n?=?100) residents. To account for clustering effect of zip codes, multilevel modeling approach for a dichotomized outcome was conducted to evaluate the association between racial/ethnic neighborhood sample and dependent variables.ResultsStores located in zip codes with a high percentage of non-Hispanic Blacks had more than eight times higher odds of selling LCCs (OR?=?8.10; 95% CI?=?3.10–21.11 vs. non-Hispanic White), more than five times higher odds of selling flavored LCCs (OR?=?5.20; 95% CI?=?2.33–11.61 vs. non-Hispanic White), and more than six times higher odds of displaying storefront exterior LCC signage (OR?=?6.03; 95% CI?=?2.93–12.40 vs. non-Hispanic White). Stores in Hispanic/Latino and Korean American communities had about three times higher odds of selling LCCs (OR?=?3.02; 95% CI?=?1.15–7.93 vs. non-Hispanic White; OR?=?2.99; 95% CI?=?1.33–6.71 vs. non-Hispanic White).ConclusionsLCCs are heavily marketed in retail establishments in Los Angeles, with disproportionate targeting of predominantly non-White neighborhoods, especially stores in neighborhoods with a higher proportion of African Americans. Local, state, and federal flavor restrictions, minimum pack size standards, preventive messages, and campaigns could counter the influence of LCC marketing in retail establishments.
机译:引言在低收入,非白人社区主要存在卷烟广告的迹象凸显了需要检查零售雪茄烟和小雪茄和小雪茄(LCC)等新型烟草产品的促销。我们试图调查零售价LCC营销中邻国的种族/种族差异,包括可用性,广告,价格促销和加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的产品放置方法.2016年1月至2017年4月,进行了社区卫生工作者(n = 19)来自邮递区中烟草零售商店的现场观察审核(n?=?679),其中非西班牙裔白人(n?=?196),黑人(n?=?194),西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔( n?=?189)或韩裔美国人(n?=?100)居民。为了考虑邮政编码的聚类效果,针对二分结果进行了多级建模方法,以评估种族/族裔邻里样本与因变量之间的关联。结果位于邮政编码中且非西班牙裔黑人比例较高的商店中有八家以上出售LCC的几率高(OR?=?8.10; 95%CI?=?3.10-21.11),是非西班牙裔白人的几率高出五倍以上(OR?=?5.20; 95%CI与非西班牙裔白人相比,?=?2.33–11.61),展示店面外部LCC标牌的几率高出6倍以上(OR?=?6.03; 95%CI?=?2.93–12.40与非西班牙裔美国人白) 。西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔和韩裔美国人社区的商店出售LCC的几率约为三倍(OR == 3.02; 95%CI == 1.15-7.93,而非西班牙裔白人; OR?=?2.99; 95%CI ?=?1.33–6.71对比非西班牙裔白人)。结论LCC在洛杉矶的零售场所大量销售,主要针对非白人社区,尤其是在非裔美国人比例较高的社区中的商店。当地,州和联邦的口味限制,最小包装尺寸标准,预防性信息和宣传活动可以抵消LCC营销在零售场所的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号