...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Rehabilitation >Ergotrophic and trophotropic relaxation techniques as a way of patient’s pain management - pilot study
【24h】

Ergotrophic and trophotropic relaxation techniques as a way of patient’s pain management - pilot study

机译:人体营养和滋养松弛技术可作为患者疼痛管理的一种方法-初步研究

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: In Wroclaw experiment investigated whether and to what extent participation in a four-day short courses relaxation affects the experience of pain and whether there is a difference in the experience of pain in participants of trophotropic and ergotropic relaxation activities. Material and methods: Participants according to preferences of strategy of how to cope with pain were assigned to the two groups. Ergotropic relaxation group was represented at trial by a "movement meditation" concern practice-oriented activity of the body and body work. Trophotropic relaxation group was represented at trial by "meditation seat" and focus more on the content of consciousness while maintaining the passivity of the body. The experiment was performed in the Psychology Unit (University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw) in the relaxation room. Fourteen people took part in this research (10 women and 4 men in the age between 35-55). During experiment all individuals were asked to complete a questionnaire CSQ (Coping Strategies Questionnaire) A.C. Rosenstiel'a and F.J. Keefe'go and VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) as a pain scale. VAS scale was used before (pre-test) and after (post-test) relaxation training.Results: Both groups, ergotropic as well as trophotropic, reduced experience of pain. After relaxation session (post-test) according to VAS scale the mean score of the ergotropic relaxation group was 2,7 and for trophotropic group - 3,8. It was statistically significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions: The experiment showed that the technique of dynamic relaxation was more effective in reducing pain. Perhaps the choice of relaxation techniques aimed at changing the perception of discomfort, we should take into account the ability of how to cope and reduce pain. Perhaps this is the most important factor when choosing a specific relaxation technique.
机译:简介:在弗罗茨瓦夫进行的一项实验研究了参加为期四天的短期课程放松是否会在何种程度上影响疼痛的体验,以及滋养性和人体工程性放松活动参与者的疼痛体验是否有所不同。材料和方法:根据如何应对疼痛的策略,将参与者分为两组。人体工程放松组在试验中以“运动冥想”为代表,关注身体和身体工作的实践导向活动。滋养松弛组在试验中以“冥想坐位”为代表,并更多地关注意识内容,同时保持身体的被动性。实验是在休闲室的心理学系(弗罗茨瓦夫大学体育学院)进行的。十四人参加了这项研究(年龄在35-55岁之间的10位女性和4位男性)。在实验过程中,要求所有个人填写一份问卷CSQ(应对策略问卷)A.C。Rosenstiel'a和F.J. Keefe'go和VAS(视觉模拟量表)作为疼痛量表。在放松训练前(测试前)和训练后(测试后)均使用VAS量表。结果:两组均符合人体工程学和滋养性,可减少疼痛感。放松会议后(测试后),根据VAS量表,对人体有益的放松组的平均评分为2.7,对于对养性放松组的平均评分为3.8。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义。结论:实验表明,动态放松技术在减轻疼痛方面更为有效。也许选择放松技术旨在改变不适感,我们应该考虑如何应付和减轻疼痛的能力。选择特定的放松技巧时,这可能是最重要的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号