...
首页> 外文期刊>Addictive Behaviors Reports >A test of the Social Identity Model of Cessation Maintenance: The content and role of social control
【24h】

A test of the Social Identity Model of Cessation Maintenance: The content and role of social control

机译:戒烟维持的社会认同模型的检验:社会控制的内容和作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Engagement with self-help groups is a predictor of positive outcomes for those attempting to control their addictive behaviours. In common with other groups, self-help groups have to manage non-normative (‘deviant’) behaviour to ensure the social values of the group remain preserved, and the group can fulfil its aims. These processes may protect group members from relapse. Drawing on the Social Identity Model of Cessation Maintenance, the current study asked a number ( n = 44) of attendees of fellowship (AA/NA/CA) and of SMART groups to list behaviours they saw as normative and deviant, and rate a variety of responses to deviant behaviours. Costs of relapse to both the self and the group were also measured alongside self-efficacy regarding cessation and identity as both an active addict and as a member of a self-help group. Results suggest that social control responses to deviance grouped into education, punishment and avoidant type responses. More social control was perceived by highly identifying self-help group members. Educational responses were seen as used by groups more extensively than other responses. Punishment responses were mediated by the perceived costs an individual's relapse incurred on the rest of the group. These findings inform our understanding of what standards of normative and deviant behaviour self-help groups hold, and how they react to violations of such norms. They also have a number of implications for practitioners and facilitators in regard to using social identities as part of the treatment process. Highlights ? Self-help groups are a prevalent and often effective aid to addiction cessation. ? Social Identity Model of Cessation Maintenance describes related social processes. ? Current study explored such mechanisms in instances members violated group norms. ? Social control mechanisms comprised education, punishment and avoidant responses. ? Punishment responses influenced by identity, and mediated by actions cost to group.
机译:对于那些试图控制其成瘾行为的人来说,与自助团体的参与是积极成果的预测指标。与其他小组一样,自助小组必须管理非规范性(“偏差”)行为,以确保该小组的社会价值得以保留,并且该小组可以实现其目标。这些过程可以防止组成员复发。利用戒烟维持的社会认同模型,当前的研究要求团契(AA / NA / CA)和SMART小组的参与者(n = 44)列出他们认为是规范和偏差的行为,并对各种行为进行评分对异常行为的回应。自我和小组的复发成本也与自我效能感有关,既可以作为戒烟者,也可以作为自助小组成员的戒断和认同感。结果表明,社会控制对偏差的反应分为教育,惩罚和回避型反应。通过高度识别自助小组成员,人们意识到了更多的社会控制权。与其他回应相比,人们认为教育回应被小组更广泛地使用。惩罚反应是由个人对其他人的复发所产生的感知成本所介导的。这些发现使我们了解了自助小组的规范和异常行为标准是什么,以及他们如何应对违反此类规范的行为。在使用社会身份作为治疗过程的一部分时,它们也对从业者和促进者有许多影响。强调 ?自助团体是戒毒的一种普遍且通常有效的手段。 ?戒烟维持的社会认同模型描述了相关的社会过程。 ?当前的研究探索了实例成员违反群体规范的这种机制。 ?社会控制机制包括教育,惩罚和回避反应。 ?惩罚反应受身份的影响,并受行动成本的介导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号