首页> 外文学位 >Testing the boundary conditions of justice climate effects: The moderating role of moral identity and corporate social responsibility.
【24h】

Testing the boundary conditions of justice climate effects: The moderating role of moral identity and corporate social responsibility.

机译:测试司法气候影响的边界条件:道德认同和企业社会责任的调节作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While the lion's share of organizational justice research focuses on individual perceptions, researchers have recognized the value of group perceptions in understanding justice phenomena. Justice climate (i.e., shared perceptions of fairness among workgroup members) has often been studied using facet-specific and source-specific justice climates (e.g. procedural justice climate, supervisor justice climate) demonstrating the predictive power of group level perceptions of fairness. However, little research has explored the boundary conditions of justice climate effects. In this study, I propose that overall justice climate has a significant impact on group prosocial and deviant behaviors. I also propose that group perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and group moral identity moderate these effects and that these three variables (justice climate perceptions, group CSR perceptions, and group differences in moral identity) interact to impact organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) and deviance. A laboratory study was carried out to test these hypotheses. Results showed a significant effect for overall justice climate and a near marginal three-way interaction effect for overall justice climate, group moral identity, and group CSR perceptions. The implications for justice research are also discussed.
机译:尽管组织正义研究的大部分都集中在个人观念上,但研究人员已经认识到群体观念在理解正义现象中的价值。司法氛围(即工作组成员之间对公平的共同看法)经常使用针对方面和针对特定来源的司法氛围(例如程序正义氛围,监督者正义氛围)进行研究,以证明团体层面的公平感具有预测力。但是,很少有研究探索正义气候效应的边界条件。在这项研究中,我认为总体司法环境对群体亲社会和越轨行为具有重大影响。我还建议,团体对公司社会责任(CSR)的认知和团体道德认同会缓和这些影响,并且这三个变量(正义的气候观,团体CSR认知和团体的道德认同差异)会相互影响组织公民行为(OCB)。和偏差。进行了一项实验室研究以检验这些假设。结果显示,对整体正义氛围具有显着影响,而对整体正义氛围,群体道德认同和群体企业社会责任感则几乎具有边际三向互动效应。还讨论了对司法研究的意义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Thornton, Meghan A.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Psychology General.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 88 p.
  • 总页数 88
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号